VGT vs. IVV
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 25.19%/yr vs 15.47%/yr for IVV. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
VGT vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed IVV with an annualized return of 25.19%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively lower 15.47% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- 1Y
- 47.99%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
IVV
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.47%
VGT vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -18.16% | 28.76% | 18.40% | 31.07% | -4.49% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and IVV is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.87 |
The correlation between VGT and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
VGT vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGT
IVV
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
VGT
IVV
Communication Services
VGT
IVV
Financial Services
VGT
IVV
Industrials
VGT
IVV
Energy
VGT
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
VGT
IVV
Basic Materials
VGT
IVV
Healthcare
VGT
IVV
Consumer Defensive
VGT
-
IVV
Real Estate
VGT
-
IVV
Utilities
VGT
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
IVV
VGT vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGT | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 2.76 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | 12.43 | -3.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGT vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, roughly equal to the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -55.25% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -8.89% | -7.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -18.75% | -8.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -24.53% | -10.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -33.90% | -1.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.18% | -2.35% | -4.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -10.77% | +2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 1.97% | +3.31% |
Volatility
VGT vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 4.37%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.00% | 4.37% | +5.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.00% | 9.59% | +8.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.00% | 12.28% | +9.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 16.95% | +8.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 18.08% | +6.64% |
VGT vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VGT vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than IVV's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.08% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and IVV have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to IVV (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.19% vs 15.47% for IVV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 15.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.08%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.03% for IVV.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer