VGT vs. FGDL
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) and FGDL (Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while FGDL is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VGT returned 29.84%/yr vs 29.18%/yr for FGDL. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VGT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FGDL.
Performance
VGT vs. FGDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly higher than FGDL's -2.81% return.
VGT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- 1Y
- 50.48%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
FGDL
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -9.80%
- YTD
- -2.81%
- 6M
- -2.54%
- 1Y
- 22.12%
- 3Y*
- 29.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT vs. FGDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -3.09% |
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF | -2.81% | 64.15% | 27.31% | 12.92% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and FGDL is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2022 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. FGDL — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
FGDL
VGT vs. FGDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGT | FGDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.18 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 0.97 | +1.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | 2.78 | +6.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGT vs. FGDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than FGDL's maximum drawdown of -24.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and FGDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | FGDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -24.73% | -29.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -24.73% | +8.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -24.73% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.18% | -22.35% | +15.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -3.97% | -3.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 8.64% | -3.36% |
Volatility
VGT vs. FGDL - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) at 8.01%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | FGDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.00% | 8.01% | +1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.00% | 24.16% | -6.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.00% | 27.60% | -5.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 19.27% | +6.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 19.27% | +5.45% |
VGT vs. FGDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FGDL's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VGT vs. FGDL - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while FGDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGDL Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and FGDL have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to FGDL (8.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs FGDL's -24.73%.
On 3-year performance, VGT leads with 29.84% vs 29.18% for FGDL. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FGDL has been the lower-risk option at 8.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VGT has performed better with a 29.84% return vs 29.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FGDL.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for FGDL.
VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while FGDL is Precious Metals. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while FGDL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.15% for FGDL.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and FGDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer