PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGT vs. EMXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGT vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.57% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 32.33% return.


VGT

1D
1.71%
1M
4.28%
YTD
24.57%
6M
21.33%
1Y
50.38%
3Y*
31.24%
5Y*
20.82%
10Y*
25.14%

EMXC

1D
2.43%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
32.33%
6M
36.39%
1Y
62.72%
3Y*
25.41%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGT vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.57%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%11.19%
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
32.33%35.14%2.68%18.96%-19.56%8.54%12.76%15.80%-12.96%7.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and EMXC is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2017

0.63

The correlation between VGT and EMXC shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VGT vs. EMXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGT
EMXC

Technology

98.5%
45.0%

Communication Services

0.5%
3.4%

Financial Services

0.5%
19.6%

Industrials

0.4%
8.3%

Energy

0.3%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
4.5%

Basic Materials

0.0%
6.8%

Healthcare

0.0%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.9%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Technology

VGT
98.5%
EMXC
45.0%

Communication Services

VGT
0.5%
EMXC
3.4%

Financial Services

VGT
0.5%
EMXC
19.6%

Industrials

VGT
0.4%
EMXC
8.3%

Energy

VGT
0.3%
EMXC
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VGT
0.1%
EMXC
4.5%

Basic Materials

VGT
0.0%
EMXC
6.8%

Healthcare

VGT
0.0%
EMXC
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

VGT

-

EMXC
2.9%

Real Estate

VGT

-

EMXC
1.0%

Utilities

VGT

-

EMXC
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGT vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

EMXC
EMXC Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EMXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXC Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGTEMXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.50

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

4.37

-1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

17.27

-7.50

VGT vs. EMXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the EMXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and EMXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGTEMXCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.71

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.65

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.50

+0.17

Drawdowns

VGT vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than EMXC's maximum drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and EMXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGTEMXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-42.81%

-11.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-14.41%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

-19.12%

-8.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

-28.91%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.77%

-7.55%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-10.19%

+2.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.17%

3.64%

+1.53%

Volatility

VGT vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is 9.39%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 12.57%. This indicates that VGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGTEMXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.39%

12.57%

-3.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.44%

21.20%

-3.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

23.27%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.33%

17.82%

+7.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.69%

19.99%

+4.70%

VGT vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGT vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than EMXC's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMXC
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
2.13%2.82%2.69%1.83%2.85%1.78%1.45%3.25%2.63%0.99%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGT and EMXC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMXC has higher volatility (12.57%) compared to VGT (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs EMXC's -42.81%.

On 5-year performance, VGT leads with 20.82% vs 11.46% for EMXC. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 9.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VGT has performed better with a 20.82% return vs 11.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.

EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.49% for EMXC.

EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGT and EMXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer