VGT vs. CMCSA
VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while CMCSA (Comcast Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VGT returned 25.19%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for CMCSA. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VGT vs. CMCSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly higher than CMCSA's -5.28% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed CMCSA with an annualized return of 25.19%, while CMCSA has yielded a comparatively lower 1.27% annualized return.
VGT
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 24.13%
- 1Y
- 50.48%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
CMCSA
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -2.66%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- -17.53%
- 3Y*
- -8.98%
- 5Y*
- -10.72%
- 10Y*
- 1.27%
VGT vs. CMCSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 24.03% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
CMCSA Comcast Corporation | -5.28% | -17.35% | -11.84% | 29.08% | -28.68% | -2.22% | 19.13% | 34.04% | -12.71% | 17.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGT and CMCSA is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.46 |
The correlation between VGT and CMCSA shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGT vs. CMCSA — Risk / Return Rank
VGT
CMCSA
VGT vs. CMCSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Comcast Corporation (CMCSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGT | CMCSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 0.90 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | -0.67 | +3.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | -1.26 | +10.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGT vs. CMCSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, smaller than the maximum CMCSA drawdown of -67.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and CMCSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGT | CMCSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.63% | -67.89% | +13.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.40% | -27.34% | +10.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.23% | -39.87% | +12.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.07% | -52.11% | +17.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.07% | -52.11% | +17.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.18% | -47.99% | +40.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -24.62% | +16.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.28% | 14.38% | -9.10% |
Volatility
VGT vs. CMCSA - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) at 7.12%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMCSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGT | CMCSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.00% | 7.12% | +2.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.00% | 24.86% | -6.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.00% | 29.24% | -7.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 26.96% | -1.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.72% | 26.49% | -1.77% |
Dividends
VGT vs. CMCSA - Dividend Comparison
VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than CMCSA's 11.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCSA Comcast Corporation | 11.84% | 4.35% | 3.25% | 2.60% | 3.03% | 1.95% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 2.69% | 1.18% | 1.96% | 1.73% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.33% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGT and CMCSA have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to CMCSA (7.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs CMCSA's -67.89%.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGT and CMCSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer