PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGT vs. BIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGT vs. BIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGT achieves a 24.03% return, which is significantly higher than BIV's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, VGT has outperformed BIV with an annualized return of 25.19%, while BIV has yielded a comparatively lower 1.89% annualized return.


VGT

1D
0.58%
1M
1.35%
YTD
24.03%
6M
24.13%
1Y
50.48%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
20.35%
10Y*
25.19%

BIV

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.26%
YTD
-0.06%
6M
0.31%
1Y
4.61%
3Y*
4.62%
5Y*
0.16%
10Y*
1.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGT vs. BIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
24.03%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
-0.06%8.52%1.57%6.07%-13.21%-2.40%9.67%10.34%-0.19%3.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VGT and BIV is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

-0.14

The correlation between VGT and BIV shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGT vs. BIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

BIV
BIV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
BIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
BIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGT vs. BIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGTBIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.19

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

1.36

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.11

3.90

+5.21

VGT vs. BIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGT Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the BIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGT and BIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGT vs. BIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGT drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than BIV's maximum drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGT and BIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGTBIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.63%

-18.95%

-35.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.40%

-3.18%

-13.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

-6.07%

-21.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

-18.74%

-16.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

-18.95%

-16.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-1.86%

-5.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.95%

-3.39%

-4.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

1.10%

+4.18%

Volatility

VGT vs. BIV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a higher volatility of 10.00% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF (BIV) at 1.45%. This indicates that VGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGTBIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.00%

1.45%

+8.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.00%

2.98%

+15.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.00%

4.03%

+17.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.40%

6.41%

+18.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.72%

5.51%

+19.21%

VGT vs. BIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BIV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGT vs. BIV - Dividend Comparison

VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than BIV's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIV
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Bond Index ETF
4.21%4.01%3.79%3.09%2.41%3.42%2.95%2.75%2.88%2.69%3.01%3.02%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.33%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGT and BIV have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (10.00%) compared to BIV (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGT dropped -54.63% vs BIV's -18.95%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 25.19% vs 1.89% for BIV. On fees, BIV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 1.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BIV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.

BIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 0.33% for VGT.

VGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while BIV is Intermediate Core Bond. VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index, while BIV tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5–10 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VGT and 0.03% for BIV.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGT and BIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer