PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGSH vs. PAVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGSH vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGSH achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 20.86% return.


VGSH

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.16%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.83%
1Y
3.36%
3Y*
4.25%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
1.73%

PAVE

1D
1.01%
1M
1.64%
YTD
20.86%
6M
18.50%
1Y
38.94%
3Y*
25.14%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGSH vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
0.57%5.07%4.00%4.31%-3.86%-0.60%3.04%3.52%1.55%0.35%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
20.86%19.36%17.92%31.01%-7.17%36.42%19.72%33.26%-19.15%13.41%

Correlation

The correlation between VGSH and PAVE is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017

-0.10

The correlation between VGSH and PAVE shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGSH vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGSH
VGSH Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VGSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VGSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGSH vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGSHPAVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.32

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

3.11

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.67

11.32

+3.35

VGSH vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGSH and PAVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGSH vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGSH drawdown since its inception was -5.70%, smaller than the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGSH and PAVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGSHPAVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-44.08%

+38.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.88%

-11.91%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.97%

-26.23%

+25.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.66%

-26.23%

+20.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.21%

-1.01%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.60%

-6.23%

+5.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

3.27%

-3.04%

Volatility

VGSH vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) is 0.37%, while Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that VGSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGSHPAVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.37%

7.35%

-6.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.90%

15.87%

-14.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.28%

19.49%

-18.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.97%

21.70%

-19.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.58%

24.40%

-22.82%

VGSH vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGSH has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGSH vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

VGSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than PAVE's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.76%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%0.00%0.00%
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
3.87%4.00%4.18%3.31%1.15%0.66%1.74%2.28%1.79%1.10%0.84%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGSH and PAVE have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAVE has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to VGSH (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGSH dropped -5.70% vs PAVE's -44.08%.

On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 17.84% vs 1.83% for VGSH. On fees, VGSH is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 17.84% return vs 1.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGSH is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for PAVE.

VGSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.76% for PAVE.

VGSH is categorized as Government Bonds, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. VGSH tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGSH and 0.47% for PAVE.

VGSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGSH and PAVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer