PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGPMX vs. NFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGPMX vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGPMX achieves a 14.15% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -11.86% return. Over the past 10 years, VGPMX has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of 10.80%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.31% annualized return.


VGPMX

1D
-4.16%
1M
-3.28%
YTD
14.15%
6M
19.93%
1Y
54.88%
3Y*
28.92%
5Y*
18.90%
10Y*
10.80%

NFLX

1D
0.56%
1M
-5.54%
YTD
-11.86%
6M
-14.62%
1Y
-33.43%
3Y*
25.31%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*
24.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGPMX vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
14.15%65.96%5.78%10.06%7.34%19.50%17.21%20.67%-32.26%13.75%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-11.86%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%

Correlation

The correlation between VGPMX and NFLX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2002

0.21

The correlation between VGPMX and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGPMX vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGPMX
VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGPMX vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGPMXNFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

0.82

+0.74

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.33

-0.77

+5.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.90

-1.36

+19.25

VGPMX vs. NFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGPMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.19, which is higher than the NFLX Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGPMX and NFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGPMXNFLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

-1.01

+4.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.09

0.26

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.59

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.58

-0.32

Drawdowns

VGPMX vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGPMX drawdown since its inception was -78.85%, roughly equal to the maximum NFLX drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGPMX and NFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGPMXNFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.85%

-81.99%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-43.35%

+30.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

-43.35%

+28.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.71%

-75.95%

+53.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.59%

-75.95%

+21.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.77%

-38.29%

+32.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-24.90%

-9.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

24.70%

-21.61%

Volatility

VGPMX vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) have volatilities of 6.90% and 6.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGPMXNFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.90%

6.64%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.59%

25.22%

-10.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.35%

33.15%

-15.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

43.10%

-25.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.91%

41.52%

-20.61%

Dividends

VGPMX vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison

VGPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
3.42%2.59%2.68%3.22%3.27%3.26%2.03%2.39%3.02%0.02%1.72%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGPMX and NFLX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGPMX has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to NFLX (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGPMX dropped -78.85% vs NFLX's -81.99%.

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGPMX and NFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer