PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGPMX vs. GCIIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGPMX vs. GCIIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGPMX achieves a 16.43% return, which is significantly higher than GCIIX's 13.92% return. Over the past 10 years, VGPMX has underperformed GCIIX with an annualized return of 9.23%, while GCIIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.21% annualized return.


VGPMX

1D
0.04%
1M
2.44%
6M
3.55%
YTD
16.43%
1Y
55.56%
3Y*
28.41%
5Y*
20.40%
10Y*
9.23%
ALL TIME*
6.51%

GCIIX

1D
0.58%
1M
0.68%
6M
5.99%
YTD
13.92%
1Y
29.99%
3Y*
23.51%
5Y*
12.20%
10Y*
11.21%
ALL TIME*
6.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VGPMX vs. GCIIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
16.43%65.96%5.78%10.06%7.34%19.50%17.21%20.67%-32.26%13.75%
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
13.92%40.72%9.65%20.80%-14.91%11.71%7.83%18.52%-15.82%29.65%

Correlation

The correlation between VGPMX and GCIIX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 1997

0.58

Over the past year, VGPMX and GCIIX have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.58, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGPMX vs. GCIIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VGPMX
VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

GCIIX
GCIIX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GCIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
GCIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VGPMX vs. GCIIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGPMXGCIIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.36

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

2.61

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.22

9.68

+5.53

VGPMX vs. GCIIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGPMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.20, which is higher than the GCIIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGPMX and GCIIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGPMX vs. GCIIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGPMX drawdown since its inception was -78.85%, which is greater than GCIIX's maximum drawdown of -61.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGPMX and GCIIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGPMXGCIIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.85%

-61.08%

-17.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.80%

-12.33%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.63%

-13.25%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.71%

-30.58%

+7.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.56%

-39.85%

-14.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.89%

-0.43%

-3.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.44%

-14.96%

-19.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.79%

3.31%

+0.48%

Volatility

VGPMX vs. GCIIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) is 4.33%, while Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund (GCIIX) has a volatility of 4.73%. This indicates that VGPMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCIIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGPMXGCIIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

4.73%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.95%

13.94%

+1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

16.25%

+1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

16.24%

+1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.63%

16.54%

+4.09%

VGPMX vs. GCIIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGPMX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than GCIIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGPMX vs. GCIIX - Dividend Comparison

VGPMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, less than GCIIX's 6.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCIIX
Goldman Sachs International Equity Insights Fund
6.83%7.78%9.24%2.81%3.94%6.33%1.86%2.46%1.94%1.62%2.51%1.45%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
3.35%2.59%2.68%3.22%3.27%3.26%2.03%2.39%3.02%0.02%1.72%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGPMX and GCIIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCIIX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to VGPMX (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGPMX dropped -78.85% vs GCIIX's -61.08%.

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGPMX and GCIIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer