PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGMS vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGMS vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGMS achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 12.18% return.


VGMS

1D
0.23%
1M
-0.32%
6M
0.87%
YTD
1.40%
1Y
5.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.08%

VTI

1D
1.53%
1M
1.38%
6M
9.81%
YTD
12.18%
1Y
23.70%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
14.66%
ALL TIME*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.49M$2.36M$2.04M
$1.08B$1.16B$1.24B

VGMS vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VGMS and VTI is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

0.59

The correlation between VGMS and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGMS vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VGMS
VGMS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VGMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGMS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VGMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGMS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VGMS vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGMSVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

2.67

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

11.50

-2.36

VGMS vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGMS and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGMS vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGMS drawdown since its inception was -2.46%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGMS and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGMSVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.46%

-55.45%

+52.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-8.92%

+6.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

0.00%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.31%

-7.98%

+7.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

2.07%

-1.51%

Volatility

VGMS vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS) is 0.76%, while Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that VGMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGMSVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

3.78%

-3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

10.33%

-7.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

13.08%

-9.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.17%

17.53%

-14.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.17%

18.31%

-15.14%

VGMS vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGMS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGMS vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

VGMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, more than VTI's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGMS
Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF
5.43%2.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGMS and VTI have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to VGMS (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGMS dropped -2.46% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 1-year performance, VTI leads with 23.70% vs 5.10% for VGMS. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGMS has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VTI has performed better with a 23.70% return vs 5.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VGMS.

VGMS has the higher dividend yield at 5.43%, compared with 1.04% for VTI.

VGMS is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VGMS and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGMS and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer