PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGM vs. VCRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VGM vs. VCRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals (VGM) and Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VGM vs. VCRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VGM
Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals
-0.88%11.03%8.77%0.20%
VCRB
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
0.07%7.56%2.21%0.65%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGM achieves a -0.88% return, which is significantly lower than VCRB's 0.07% return.


VGM

1D
2.23%
1M
-3.12%
YTD
-0.88%
6M
2.50%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
7.20%
5Y*
-0.01%
10Y*
2.34%

VCRB

1D
0.06%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
0.07%
6M
0.78%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGM vs. VCRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGM
VGM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGM Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VCRB
VCRB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
VCRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCRB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VCRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCRB Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGM vs. VCRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals (VGM) and Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGMVCRBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.82

1.02

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.17

1.44

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.18

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

1.66

-0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.25

4.83

-1.58

VGM vs. VCRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGM Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is comparable to the VCRB Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGM and VCRB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGMVCRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

1.02

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.95

-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between VGM and VCRB is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

VGM vs. VCRB - Dividend Comparison

VGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.68%, more than VCRB's 4.59% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGM
Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals
7.68%7.48%6.35%4.42%5.67%4.65%4.65%4.82%5.97%5.79%6.50%6.62%
VCRB
Vanguard Core Bond ETF
4.59%4.55%4.22%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VGM vs. VCRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGM drawdown since its inception was -49.40%, which is greater than VCRB's maximum drawdown of -4.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGM and VCRB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VGMVCRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.40%

-4.59%

-44.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.42%

-2.77%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.57%

-1.79%

-5.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-1.14%

-7.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

0.95%

+1.97%

Volatility

VGM vs. VCRB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals (VGM) has a higher volatility of 5.53% compared to Vanguard Core Bond ETF (VCRB) at 1.66%. This indicates that VGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VGMVCRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

1.66%

+3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.23%

2.49%

+4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

4.34%

+6.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.29%

4.82%

+6.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.32%

4.82%

+7.50%