PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGM vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals (VGM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGM achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, VGM has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 2.15%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.50% annualized return.


VGM

1D
0.59%
1M
-0.64%
YTD
1.56%
6M
2.69%
1Y
15.92%
3Y*
8.78%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
2.15%

VOO

1D
0.55%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
9.08%
6M
9.44%
1Y
24.36%
3Y*
20.95%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
15.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGM vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGM
Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals
1.56%11.03%8.77%2.99%-24.15%10.88%7.97%17.59%-7.86%9.51%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
9.08%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VGM and VOO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010

0.12

The correlation between VGM and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.29 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGM vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGM
VGM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals (VGM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGMVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.75

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.45

12.42

-3.98

VGM vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGM Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGM and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGM drawdown since its inception was -49.40%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGM and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGMVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.40%

-33.99%

-15.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.42%

-8.90%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.65%

-18.69%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.61%

-24.52%

-12.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.61%

-33.99%

-2.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.29%

-2.34%

-2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.99%

-3.68%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.97%

-0.08%

Volatility

VGM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals (VGM) is 3.85%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that VGM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGMVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

4.34%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.96%

9.58%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.33%

12.27%

-1.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.56%

16.88%

-5.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.41%

18.03%

-5.62%

Dividends

VGM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.59%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGM
Invesco Trust for Investment Grade Municipals
7.59%7.48%6.35%4.42%5.67%4.65%4.65%4.82%5.97%5.79%6.50%6.62%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.05%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGM and VOO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VOO has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to VGM (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGM dropped -49.40% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGM and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer