PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGLT vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGLT vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGLT achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, VGLT has underperformed VT with an annualized return of -1.10%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.


VGLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.71%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
-0.72%
5Y*
-5.30%
10Y*
-1.10%

VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGLT vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
-0.41%5.35%-6.28%3.27%-29.34%-4.98%17.57%14.30%-1.54%8.64%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VGLT and VT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2009

-0.23

The correlation between VGLT and VT shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGLT vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGLT vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGLTVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.42

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

3.04

-2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.96

13.53

-11.57

VGLT vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGLT and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGLTVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

2.31

-1.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

0.69

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

0.74

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.44

-0.25

Drawdowns

VGLT vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGLT drawdown since its inception was -46.18%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGLT and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGLTVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.18%

-50.27%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-9.67%

+2.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

-16.51%

-1.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.98%

-26.38%

-14.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.18%

-34.24%

-11.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.83%

-0.88%

-35.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-7.02%

-8.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

2.17%

+0.51%

Volatility

VGLT vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) is 2.59%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that VGLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGLTVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

3.83%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.94%

10.17%

-4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.88%

12.70%

-3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.58%

16.05%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.81%

17.23%

-3.42%

VGLT vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGLT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGLT vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

VGLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.61%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGLT and VT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VGLT (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGLT dropped -46.18% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.74% vs -1.10% for VGLT. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.74% return vs -1.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VT.

VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 1.59% for VT.

VGLT is categorized as Government Bonds, while VT is Global Equities. VGLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGLT and 0.06% for VT.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGLT and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer