PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGLT vs. SGOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGLT vs. SGOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGLT achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly lower than SGOL's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, VGLT has underperformed SGOL with an annualized return of -1.28%, while SGOL has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.


VGLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
-0.94%
5Y*
-5.66%
10Y*
-1.28%

SGOL

1D
0.22%
1M
-8.40%
YTD
0.32%
6M
3.15%
1Y
30.41%
3Y*
29.97%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGLT vs. SGOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
-1.16%5.35%-6.28%3.27%-29.34%-4.98%17.57%14.30%-1.54%8.64%
SGOL
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
0.32%63.99%26.90%12.99%-0.51%-3.94%25.03%18.21%-1.94%12.86%

Correlation

The correlation between VGLT and SGOL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2009

0.23

The correlation between VGLT and SGOL shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGLT vs. SGOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOL
SGOL Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SGOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOL Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOL Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGLT vs. SGOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGLTSGOLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.23

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

1.53

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.53

3.82

-2.29

VGLT vs. SGOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is lower than the SGOL Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGLT and SGOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGLTSGOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

1.15

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

1.00

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

0.80

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.54

-0.36

Drawdowns

VGLT vs. SGOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGLT drawdown since its inception was -46.18%, roughly equal to the maximum SGOL drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGLT and SGOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGLTSGOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.18%

-45.51%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-20.02%

+13.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

-20.02%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.98%

-20.92%

-20.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.18%

-21.56%

-24.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.30%

-19.84%

-17.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.08%

-18.41%

+3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

7.98%

-5.26%

Volatility

VGLT vs. SGOL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) is 2.50%, while abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that VGLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGLTSGOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

5.62%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.96%

23.24%

-17.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.71%

26.58%

-17.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

17.96%

-3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.82%

15.95%

-2.13%

VGLT vs. SGOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGLT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SGOL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGLT vs. SGOL - Dividend Comparison

VGLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, while SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGOL
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.64%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGLT and SGOL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGOL has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to VGLT (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGLT dropped -46.18% vs SGOL's -45.51%.

On 10-year performance, SGOL leads with 12.74% vs -1.28% for VGLT. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SGOL has performed better with a 12.74% return vs -1.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for SGOL.

VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.64%, compared with 0.00% for SGOL.

VGLT is categorized as Government Bonds, while SGOL is Gold. VGLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while SGOL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGLT and 0.17% for SGOL.

SGOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGLT and SGOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer