PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGLT vs. GBDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGLT vs. GBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGLT achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than GBDC's 0.68% return. Over the past 10 years, VGLT has underperformed GBDC with an annualized return of -1.21%, while GBDC has yielded a comparatively higher 6.73% annualized return.


VGLT

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.30%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.49%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
-0.30%
5Y*
-5.52%
10Y*
-1.21%

GBDC

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.53%
YTD
0.68%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
-2.64%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
6.81%
10Y*
6.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGLT vs. GBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
0.03%5.35%-6.28%3.27%-29.34%-4.98%17.57%14.30%-1.54%8.64%
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
0.68%-0.50%13.57%27.69%-6.99%17.78%-14.73%21.09%-2.20%6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VGLT and GBDC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2010

-0.09

The correlation between VGLT and GBDC shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGLT vs. GBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

GBDC
GBDC Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGLT vs. GBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGLTGBDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

0.99

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

-0.15

+0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.19

-0.31

+1.50

VGLT vs. GBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the GBDC Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGLT and GBDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGLT vs. GBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGLT drawdown since its inception was -46.18%, roughly equal to the maximum GBDC drawdown of -47.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGLT and GBDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGLTGBDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.18%

-47.30%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-18.20%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

-18.20%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.98%

-19.28%

-21.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.18%

-47.30%

+1.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.55%

-6.79%

-29.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.09%

-6.13%

-8.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

8.56%

-5.78%

Volatility

VGLT vs. GBDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) is 2.69%, while Golub Capital BDC, Inc. (GBDC) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that VGLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGLTGBDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

5.60%

-2.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.09%

15.83%

-9.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.78%

19.15%

-10.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

17.19%

-2.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.82%

21.56%

-7.74%

Dividends

VGLT vs. GBDC - Dividend Comparison

VGLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than GBDC's 11.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC, Inc.
11.29%11.50%12.73%10.00%9.35%7.58%8.44%7.70%8.49%7.47%8.32%7.70%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.59%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGLT and GBDC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GBDC has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to VGLT (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGLT dropped -46.18% vs GBDC's -47.30%.

VGLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGLT and GBDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer