PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGLT vs. BTGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGLT vs. BTGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGLT achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly higher than BTGD's -32.80% return.


VGLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
-0.94%
5Y*
-5.66%
10Y*
-1.28%

BTGD

1D
5.44%
1M
-28.40%
YTD
-32.80%
6M
-33.78%
1Y
-31.91%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGLT vs. BTGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
-1.16%5.35%-6.47%
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
-32.80%34.62%29.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VGLT and BTGD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGLT vs. BTGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

BTGD
BTGD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
BTGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTGD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BTGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTGD Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGLT vs. BTGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGLTBTGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.93

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

-0.60

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.53

-1.29

+2.82

VGLT vs. BTGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the BTGD Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGLT and BTGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGLTBTGDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

-0.57

+1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.19

0.00

Drawdowns

VGLT vs. BTGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGLT drawdown since its inception was -46.18%, smaller than the maximum BTGD drawdown of -53.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGLT and BTGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGLTBTGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.18%

-53.31%

+7.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-53.31%

+46.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.30%

-50.77%

+13.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.08%

-14.85%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

24.72%

-22.00%

Volatility

VGLT vs. BTGD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) is 2.50%, while STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that VGLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGLTBTGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

14.85%

-12.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.96%

46.45%

-40.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.71%

56.04%

-47.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

55.94%

-41.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.82%

55.94%

-42.12%

VGLT vs. BTGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGLT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BTGD's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGLT vs. BTGD - Dividend Comparison

VGLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, less than BTGD's 5.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
5.00%3.36%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.64%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGLT and BTGD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTGD has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to VGLT (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGLT dropped -46.18% vs BTGD's -53.31%.

On 1-year performance, VGLT leads with 4.15% vs -31.91% for BTGD. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VGLT has performed better with a 4.15% return vs -31.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.

BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 4.64% for VGLT.

VGLT is categorized as Government Bonds, while BTGD is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Quantify Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGLT and 1.00% for BTGD.

VGLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGLT and BTGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer