VGLT vs. BTGD
VGLT (Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF) and BTGD (STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while BTGD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Quantify Funds. VGLT is passively managed, while BTGD is actively managed. Over the past year, VGLT returned 4.15% vs -31.91% for BTGD. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VGLT charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BTGD.
Performance
VGLT vs. BTGD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGLT achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly higher than BTGD's -32.80% return.
VGLT
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- -0.94%
- 5Y*
- -5.66%
- 10Y*
- -1.28%
BTGD
- 1D
- 5.44%
- 1M
- -28.40%
- YTD
- -32.80%
- 6M
- -33.78%
- 1Y
- -31.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGLT vs. BTGD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | -1.16% | 5.35% | -6.47% |
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | -32.80% | 34.62% | 29.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGLT and BTGD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGLT vs. BTGD — Risk / Return Rank
VGLT
BTGD
VGLT vs. BTGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGLT | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.93 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | -0.60 | +1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.53 | -1.29 | +2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGLT | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | -0.57 | +1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
VGLT vs. BTGD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGLT drawdown since its inception was -46.18%, smaller than the maximum BTGD drawdown of -53.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGLT and BTGD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGLT | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.18% | -53.31% | +7.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | -53.31% | +46.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.30% | -50.77% | +13.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.08% | -14.85% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 24.72% | -22.00% |
Volatility
VGLT vs. BTGD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) is 2.50%, while STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that VGLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGLT | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.50% | 14.85% | -12.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.96% | 46.45% | -40.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.71% | 56.04% | -47.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.57% | 55.94% | -41.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 55.94% | -42.12% |
VGLT vs. BTGD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGLT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BTGD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGLT vs. BTGD - Dividend Comparison
VGLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, less than BTGD's 5.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | 5.00% | 3.36% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | 4.64% | 4.44% | 4.33% | 3.33% | 2.84% | 1.82% | 2.15% | 2.46% | 2.71% | 2.55% | 2.69% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGLT and BTGD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTGD has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to VGLT (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGLT dropped -46.18% vs BTGD's -53.31%.
On 1-year performance, VGLT leads with 4.15% vs -31.91% for BTGD. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VGLT has performed better with a 4.15% return vs -31.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.
BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 4.64% for VGLT.
VGLT is categorized as Government Bonds, while BTGD is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Quantify Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGLT and 1.00% for BTGD.
VGLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGLT and BTGD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer