PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGLT vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGLT vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGLT achieves a -3.26% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 77.90% return. Over the past 10 years, VGLT has underperformed BNO with an annualized return of -1.80%, while BNO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.06% annualized return.


VGLT

1D
-0.62%
1M
-3.51%
6M
-3.14%
YTD
-3.26%
1Y
-1.67%
3Y*
-0.62%
5Y*
-7.07%
10Y*
-1.80%
ALL TIME*
2.27%

BNO

1D
1.45%
1M
27.00%
6M
52.90%
YTD
77.90%
1Y
62.83%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*
15.06%
ALL TIME*
4.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.13M$97.34M$147.52M
$95.69M$98.86M$108.97M

VGLT vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
-3.26%5.35%-6.28%3.27%-29.34%-4.98%17.57%14.30%-1.54%8.64%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
77.90%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between VGLT and BNO is -0.42, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2010

-0.22

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between VGLT and BNO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.22 to -0.42, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGLT vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VGLT vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGLTBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.24

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

1.70

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.12

5.15

-5.27

VGLT vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGLT and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGLT vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGLT drawdown since its inception was -46.18%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGLT and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGLTBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.18%

-87.06%

+40.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-34.46%

+27.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.38%

-34.46%

+21.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.98%

-34.46%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.18%

-75.18%

+29.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.64%

-16.21%

-22.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.26%

-39.99%

+24.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

11.86%

-8.67%

Volatility

VGLT vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) is 2.24%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that VGLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGLTBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.24%

17.47%

-15.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.31%

40.96%

-34.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.47%

44.54%

-36.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

36.41%

-21.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

36.98%

-23.23%

VGLT vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGLT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGLT vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

VGLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.37%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGLT and BNO have a correlation of -0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to VGLT (2.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGLT dropped -46.18% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, BNO leads with 15.06% vs -1.80% for VGLT. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BNO has performed better with a 15.06% return vs -1.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BNO.

VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

VGLT is categorized as Government Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. VGLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while BNO tracks Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGLT and 1.00% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGLT and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer