PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGIT vs. BTGD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGIT vs. BTGD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGIT achieves a -0.62% return, which is significantly higher than BTGD's -35.83% return.


VGIT

1D
-0.20%
1M
-0.36%
6M
-0.20%
YTD
-0.62%
1Y
2.27%
3Y*
3.53%
5Y*
-0.18%
10Y*
1.13%
ALL TIME*
2.14%

BTGD

1D
4.01%
1M
0.82%
6M
-42.84%
YTD
-35.83%
1Y
-42.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGIT vs. BTGD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
-0.62%7.34%-1.60%
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
-35.83%34.62%29.32%

Correlation

The correlation between VGIT and BTGD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2024

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGIT vs. BTGD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGIT
VGIT Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VGIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VGIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BTGD
BTGD Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BTGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTGD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
BTGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTGD Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGIT vs. BTGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGITBTGDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.90

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

-0.73

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.98

-1.39

+3.37

VGIT vs. BTGD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGIT Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the BTGD Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGIT and BTGD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGIT vs. BTGD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGIT drawdown since its inception was -16.05%, smaller than the maximum BTGD drawdown of -58.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGIT and BTGD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGITBTGDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.05%

-58.79%

+42.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-58.79%

+55.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-52.99%

+50.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-17.44%

+13.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

30.90%

-29.75%

Volatility

VGIT vs. BTGD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) is 0.96%, while STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a volatility of 15.69%. This indicates that VGIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGITBTGDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

15.69%

-14.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.57%

47.88%

-45.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.37%

57.94%

-54.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.39%

55.96%

-50.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.49%

55.96%

-51.47%

VGIT vs. BTGD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGIT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BTGD's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGIT vs. BTGD - Dividend Comparison

VGIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than BTGD's 5.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BTGD
STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF
5.24%3.36%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
3.89%3.79%3.67%2.73%1.74%1.69%2.23%2.24%2.05%1.67%1.69%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGIT and BTGD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BTGD has higher volatility (15.69%) compared to VGIT (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGIT dropped -16.05% vs BTGD's -58.79%.

On 1-year performance, VGIT leads with 2.27% vs -42.90% for BTGD. On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGIT has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VGIT has performed better with a 2.27% return vs -42.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.

BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 3.89% for VGIT.

VGIT is categorized as Government Bonds, while BTGD is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Quantify Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGIT and 1.00% for BTGD.

VGIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGIT and BTGD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer