VGIT vs. BTGD
VGIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF) and BTGD (STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGIT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 3-10 Year Index, while BTGD is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Quantify Funds. VGIT is passively managed, while BTGD is actively managed. Over the past year, VGIT returned 3.55% vs -31.91% for BTGD. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VGIT charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BTGD.
Performance
VGIT vs. BTGD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGIT achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly higher than BTGD's -32.80% return.
VGIT
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- -0.42%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.16%
BTGD
- 1D
- 5.44%
- 1M
- -28.40%
- YTD
- -32.80%
- 6M
- -33.78%
- 1Y
- -31.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGIT vs. BTGD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | -0.78% | 7.34% | -1.70% |
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | -32.80% | 34.62% | 29.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGIT and BTGD is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGIT vs. BTGD — Risk / Return Rank
VGIT
BTGD
VGIT vs. BTGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGIT | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.93 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | -0.60 | +1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.66 | -1.29 | +4.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGIT | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | -0.57 | +1.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.19 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
VGIT vs. BTGD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGIT drawdown since its inception was -16.05%, smaller than the maximum BTGD drawdown of -53.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGIT and BTGD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGIT | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.05% | -53.31% | +37.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -53.31% | +50.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -50.77% | +48.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -14.85% | +11.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 24.72% | -23.75% |
Volatility
VGIT vs. BTGD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) is 1.05%, while STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF (BTGD) has a volatility of 14.85%. This indicates that VGIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGIT | BTGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 14.85% | -13.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.36% | 46.45% | -44.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.32% | 56.04% | -52.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 55.94% | -50.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.50% | 55.94% | -51.44% |
VGIT vs. BTGD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGIT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BTGD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGIT vs. BTGD - Dividend Comparison
VGIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.88%, less than BTGD's 5.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTGD STKD Bitcoin & Gold ETF | 5.00% | 3.36% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF | 3.88% | 3.79% | 3.67% | 2.73% | 1.74% | 1.69% | 2.23% | 2.24% | 2.05% | 1.67% | 1.69% | 1.69% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGIT and BTGD have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BTGD has higher volatility (14.85%) compared to VGIT (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGIT dropped -16.05% vs BTGD's -53.31%.
On 1-year performance, VGIT leads with 3.55% vs -31.91% for BTGD. On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VGIT has performed better with a 3.55% return vs -31.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for BTGD.
BTGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 3.88% for VGIT.
VGIT is categorized as Government Bonds, while BTGD is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Quantify Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGIT and 1.00% for BTGD.
VGIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGIT and BTGD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer