PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGIT vs. AVLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGIT vs. AVLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGIT achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly lower than AVLV's 21.54% return.


VGIT

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.06%
YTD
-0.29%
6M
0.04%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
3.69%
5Y*
0.01%
10Y*
1.20%

AVLV

1D
0.72%
1M
4.03%
YTD
21.54%
6M
21.48%
1Y
38.63%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGIT vs. AVLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
-0.29%7.34%1.39%4.28%-10.53%-1.50%
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
21.54%15.12%17.49%17.43%-5.53%6.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VGIT and AVLV is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021

0.03

The correlation between VGIT and AVLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGIT vs. AVLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGIT
VGIT Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
VGIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
VGIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

AVLV
AVLV Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AVLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AVLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGIT vs. AVLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) and Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGITAVLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.56

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

6.07

-4.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

24.12

-20.95

VGIT vs. AVLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGIT Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the AVLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGIT and AVLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGIT vs. AVLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGIT drawdown since its inception was -16.05%, smaller than the maximum AVLV drawdown of -19.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGIT and AVLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGITAVLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.05%

-19.50%

+3.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.83%

-6.39%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.34%

-19.50%

+15.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.22%

0.00%

-2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-3.91%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

1.61%

-0.60%

Volatility

VGIT vs. AVLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) is 1.15%, while Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) has a volatility of 3.67%. This indicates that VGIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGITAVLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

3.67%

-2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.40%

9.33%

-6.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34%

12.52%

-9.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.38%

17.34%

-11.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.50%

17.34%

-12.84%

VGIT vs. AVLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGIT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than AVLV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGIT vs. AVLV - Dividend Comparison

VGIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, more than AVLV's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVLV
Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF
1.37%1.33%1.58%1.85%2.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury ETF
3.86%3.79%3.67%2.73%1.74%1.69%2.23%2.24%2.05%1.67%1.69%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGIT and AVLV have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVLV has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to VGIT (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGIT dropped -16.05% vs AVLV's -19.50%.

On 3-year performance, AVLV leads with 22.42% vs 3.69% for VGIT. On fees, VGIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGIT has been the lower-risk option at 1.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVLV has performed better with a 22.42% return vs 3.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for AVLV.

VGIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.86%, compared with 1.37% for AVLV.

VGIT is categorized as Government Bonds, while AVLV is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGIT and 0.15% for AVLV.

AVLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGIT and AVLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer