PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGHCX vs. MRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGHCX vs. MRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares (VGHCX) and MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGHCX achieves a -4.67% return, which is significantly lower than MRGAX's 8.17% return. Over the past 10 years, VGHCX has underperformed MRGAX with an annualized return of 8.79%, while MRGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.22% annualized return.


VGHCX

1D
-1.56%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
-4.67%
6M
-4.29%
1Y
16.18%
3Y*
8.30%
5Y*
7.16%
10Y*
8.79%

MRGAX

1D
-0.17%
1M
3.29%
YTD
8.17%
6M
8.03%
1Y
20.03%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
14.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGHCX vs. MRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGHCX
Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares
-4.67%19.63%8.99%5.46%-1.05%14.36%12.57%22.93%1.03%19.59%
MRGAX
MFS Core Equity Fund
8.17%12.33%20.01%22.88%-17.24%25.26%18.56%34.66%-4.12%23.79%

Correlation

The correlation between VGHCX and MRGAX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1996

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between VGHCX and MRGAX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGHCX vs. MRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGHCX
VGHCX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VGHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VGHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

MRGAX
MRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGHCX vs. MRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares (VGHCX) and MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGHCXMRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.31

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.18

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.60

9.19

-4.59

VGHCX vs. MRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGHCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the MRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGHCX and MRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGHCXMRGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.74

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.64

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.80

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.55

+0.38

Drawdowns

VGHCX vs. MRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGHCX drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, smaller than the maximum MRGAX drawdown of -54.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGHCX and MRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGHCXMRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.93%

-54.04%

+17.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-9.53%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.08%

-19.22%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.95%

-23.08%

+6.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.18%

-33.41%

+6.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.61%

-0.17%

-7.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-8.27%

+3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.25%

+1.19%

Volatility

VGHCX vs. MRGAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares (VGHCX) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) at 2.58%. This indicates that VGHCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGHCXMRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.79%

2.58%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

9.16%

+1.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.75%

11.94%

+2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.21%

16.78%

+1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.64%

17.80%

-0.16%

VGHCX vs. MRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGHCX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MRGAX's 0.93% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGHCX vs. MRGAX - Dividend Comparison

VGHCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, less than MRGAX's 12.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRGAX
MFS Core Equity Fund
12.57%13.60%8.21%2.54%3.83%7.28%1.54%3.20%11.09%6.27%3.65%11.02%
VGHCX
Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares
6.93%6.00%22.72%7.17%5.44%8.31%7.96%11.82%9.10%7.30%8.54%8.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGHCX and MRGAX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGHCX has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to MRGAX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGHCX dropped -36.93% vs MRGAX's -54.04%.

MRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGHCX and MRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer