MRGAX vs. FXAIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MRGAX (MFS Core Equity Fund) and FXAIX (Fidelity 500 Index Fund) are both mutual funds - MRGAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by MFS, while FXAIX is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, MRGAX returned 14.24%/yr vs 15.65%/yr for FXAIX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MRGAX charges 0.93%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FXAIX.

Performance

MRGAX vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRGAX achieves a 8.35% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's 11.56% return. Over the past 10 years, MRGAX has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 14.24%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.65% annualized return.

MRGAX

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 8.35%
• 6M: 8.62%
• 1Y: 20.87%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 10.61%
• 10Y*: 14.24%

FXAIX

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 11.56%
• 6M: 11.94%
• 1Y: 29.57%
• 3Y*: 22.70%
• 5Y*: 14.17%
• 10Y*: 15.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRGAX vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MRGAX MFS Core Equity Fund	8.35%	12.33%	20.01%	22.88%	-17.24%	25.26%	18.56%	34.66%	-4.12%	23.79%
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund	11.56%	17.84%	25.01%	26.29%	-18.14%	28.71%	18.42%	31.48%	-4.43%	21.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MRGAX and FXAIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2011	0.98

The correlation between MRGAX and FXAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MRGAX vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRGAX

MRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 37
MRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
MRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
MRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
MRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
MRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FXAIX

FXAIX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FXAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FXAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FXAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FXAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FXAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRGAX vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MRGAX	FXAIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	2.55	-0.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	3.46	-0.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.46	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	3.39	-1.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.36	15.86	-6.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MRGAX vs. FXAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is lower than the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRGAX and FXAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MRGAX	FXAIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.77	2.55	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.84	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.80	0.87	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.82	-0.28

Drawdowns

MRGAX vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRGAX drawdown since its inception was -54.04%, which is greater than FXAIX's maximum drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRGAX and FXAIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRGAX	FXAIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.04%	-33.79%	-20.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.53%	-8.89%	-0.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.22%	-18.76%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.08%	-24.50%	+1.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.41%	-33.79%	+0.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.27%	-3.79%	-4.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	1.90%	+0.35%

Volatility

MRGAX vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) is 2.56%, while Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that MRGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MRGAX	FXAIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	2.82%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.17%	8.99%	+0.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.96%	11.88%	+0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.78%	16.91%	-0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.80%	18.07%	-0.27%

MRGAX vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRGAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

MRGAX vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

MRGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.55%, more than FXAIX's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund	1.03%	1.11%	1.25%	1.45%	1.69%	1.22%	1.60%	2.06%	2.72%	1.97%	2.52%	2.83%
MRGAX MFS Core Equity Fund	12.55%	13.60%	8.21%	2.54%	3.83%	7.28%	1.54%	3.20%	11.09%	6.27%	3.65%	11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRGAX and FXAIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, MRGAX and FXAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MRGAX or FXAIX?

FXAIX has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to MRGAX (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRGAX dropped -54.04% vs FXAIX's -33.79%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FXAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.