PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGHCX vs. XLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGHCX vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares (VGHCX) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGHCX achieves a -1.85% return, which is significantly higher than XLV's -2.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VGHCX having a 9.42% annualized return and XLV not far ahead at 9.86%.


VGHCX

1D
-0.50%
1M
-0.39%
YTD
-1.85%
6M
-2.28%
1Y
21.03%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
9.42%

XLV

1D
0.88%
1M
0.56%
YTD
-2.23%
6M
-2.55%
1Y
15.69%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
5.50%
10Y*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGHCX vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGHCX
Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares
-1.85%19.63%8.99%5.46%-1.05%14.36%12.57%22.93%1.03%19.59%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
-2.23%14.50%2.47%2.07%-2.08%26.04%13.30%20.45%6.28%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VGHCX and XLV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.84

The correlation between VGHCX and XLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

VGHCX vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGHCX
XLV

Healthcare

98.3%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.2%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

VGHCX
98.3%
XLV
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

VGHCX
1.2%
XLV

-

Financial Services

VGHCX
0.0%
XLV

-

Basic Materials

VGHCX
0.0%
XLV

-

Communication Services

VGHCX

-

XLV

-

Consumer Cyclical

VGHCX

-

XLV

-

Energy

VGHCX

-

XLV

-

Industrials

VGHCX

-

XLV

-

Real Estate

VGHCX

-

XLV

-

Technology

VGHCX

-

XLV

-

Utilities

VGHCX

-

XLV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGHCX vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGHCX
VGHCX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
VGHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VGHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
XLV Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
XLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGHCX vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares (VGHCX) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGHCXXLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.19

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

1.51

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.88

3.56

+2.32

VGHCX vs. XLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGHCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the XLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGHCX and XLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGHCX vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGHCX drawdown since its inception was -36.93%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGHCX and XLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGHCXXLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.93%

-39.17%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-10.47%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.08%

-17.11%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.95%

-17.11%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.18%

-28.40%

+1.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.87%

-5.53%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-7.12%

+1.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

4.42%

-0.99%

Volatility

VGHCX vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares (VGHCX) is 4.69%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that VGHCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGHCXXLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

5.14%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.62%

10.58%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.92%

15.06%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.24%

14.76%

+3.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.65%

16.59%

+1.06%

VGHCX vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGHCX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGHCX vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

VGHCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than XLV's 2.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGHCX
Vanguard Health Care Fund Investor Shares
6.73%6.00%22.72%7.17%5.44%8.31%7.96%11.82%9.10%7.30%8.54%8.16%
XLV
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.11%1.60%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.57%1.47%1.60%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, VGHCX and XLV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XLV has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to VGHCX (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGHCX dropped -36.93% vs XLV's -39.17%.

VGHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGHCX and XLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer