PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGH.TO vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGH.TO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged (VGH.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VGH.TO is traded in CAD, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGH.TO achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 12.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VGH.TO has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.43%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.44% annualized return.


VGH.TO

1D
0.07%
1M
4.04%
YTD
6.70%
6M
5.84%
1Y
17.06%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
11.43%

VOO

1D
0.00%
1M
7.45%
YTD
12.66%
6M
10.84%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
23.99%
5Y*
17.22%
10Y*
16.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGH.TO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGH.TO
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged
6.70%11.44%15.35%12.77%-11.08%22.47%12.97%27.74%-4.59%21.46%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
12.32%12.42%35.71%23.54%-12.34%27.63%16.32%24.91%3.60%14.02%

Correlation

The correlation between VGH.TO and VOO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013

0.62

The correlation between VGH.TO and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VGH.TO vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VGH.TO
VOO

Technology

26.2%
35.7%

Financial Services

20.6%
11.6%

Healthcare

16.5%
8.5%

Industrials

11.8%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.7%
10.2%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.5%
1.8%

Utilities

3.2%
2.4%

Communication Services

0.5%
11.3%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Technology

VGH.TO
26.2%
VOO
35.7%

Financial Services

VGH.TO
20.6%
VOO
11.6%

Healthcare

VGH.TO
16.5%
VOO
8.5%

Industrials

VGH.TO
11.8%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

VGH.TO
10.1%
VOO
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VGH.TO
4.7%
VOO
10.2%

Energy

VGH.TO
3.5%
VOO
3.5%

Basic Materials

VGH.TO
3.5%
VOO
1.8%

Utilities

VGH.TO
3.2%
VOO
2.4%

Communication Services

VGH.TO
0.5%
VOO
11.3%

Real Estate

VGH.TO

-

VOO
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGH.TO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGH.TO
VGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
VGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGH.TO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged (VGH.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGH.TOVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.50

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.51

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.05

13.34

-5.29

VGH.TO vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGH.TO and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGH.TOVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.60

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

1.16

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

1.01

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

1.15

-0.43

Drawdowns

VGH.TO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGH.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.82%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -27.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGH.TO and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGH.TOVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.82%

-27.65%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.42%

-8.62%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-18.93%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.34%

-22.08%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.82%

-27.65%

-5.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-3.24%

-0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

2.26%

-0.14%

Volatility

VGH.TO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged (VGH.TO) is 2.19%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that VGH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGH.TOVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

2.60%

-0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

8.79%

-1.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.22%

11.64%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

14.91%

-0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.75%

16.28%

-0.53%

VGH.TO vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGH.TO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGH.TO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VGH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, which matches VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGH.TO
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged
1.04%1.15%1.28%1.34%1.39%1.22%1.21%1.23%1.58%1.39%1.63%1.81%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGH.TO and VOO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for VGH.TO.

VGH.TO is categorized as Dividend, while VOO is S&P 500. VGH.TO tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index (CAD-hedged), while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for VGH.TO and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGH.TO and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer