VGG.TO vs. KNGC.TO
VGG.TO (Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF) and KNGC.TO (Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGG.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while KNGC.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Brompton Index One Canadian Cash Flow Kings Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VGG.TO returned 20.66% vs 55.50% for KNGC.TO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VGG.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for KNGC.TO.
Performance
VGG.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGG.TO achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than KNGC.TO's 18.75% return.
VGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
KNGC.TO
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- YTD
- 18.75%
- 6M
- 19.23%
- 1Y
- 55.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGG.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 8.57% | 8.61% | 15.31% |
KNGC.TO Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF | 18.75% | 41.07% | 176,983.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGG.TO and KNGC.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGG.TO vs. KNGC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VGG.TO
KNGC.TO
VGG.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) and Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGG.TO | KNGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.92 | -0.56 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 14.41 | -11.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.93 | 52.56 | -41.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGG.TO | KNGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 4.54 | -2.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.04 | +0.94 |
Drawdowns
VGG.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.58%, which is greater than KNGC.TO's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGG.TO and KNGC.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGG.TO | KNGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.58% | -20.25% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -3.87% | -3.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.75% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.93% | -3.09% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.06% | +0.83% |
Volatility
VGG.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF (KNGC.TO) at 2.31%. This indicates that VGG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNGC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGG.TO | KNGC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 2.31% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | 9.01% | -1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.23% | 12.30% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 123,156.10% | -123,143.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 123,156.10% | -123,141.13% |
VGG.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGG.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than KNGC.TO's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGG.TO vs. KNGC.TO - Dividend Comparison
VGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than KNGC.TO's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNGC.TO Brompton Canadian Cash Flow Kings ETF | 1.62% | 1.69% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGG.TO and KNGC.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KNGC.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KNGC.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VGG.TO.
VGG.TO is categorized as Dividend, while KNGC.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. VGG.TO tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while KNGC.TO tracks Brompton Index One Canadian Cash Flow Kings Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Brompton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VGG.TO and 0.17% for KNGC.TO.
Find the right allocation for VGG.TO and KNGC.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer