PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFVA vs. ABLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VFVA vs. ABLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VFVA vs. ABLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
1.90%14.77%7.67%17.37%-3.96%3.68%
ABLD
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
9.02%6.64%7.05%18.89%7.42%3.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFVA achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than ABLD's 9.02% return.


VFVA

1D
1.68%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
1.90%
6M
6.70%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
14.30%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*

ABLD

1D
2.85%
1M
-6.73%
YTD
9.02%
6M
10.21%
1Y
14.65%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VFVA vs. ABLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFVA has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than ABLD's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VFVA vs. ABLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFVA
VFVA Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VFVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFVA Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VFVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFVA Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

ABLD
ABLD Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ABLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ABLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABLD Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFVA vs. ABLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) and Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFVAABLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.80

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

1.18

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.17

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.03

+0.32

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.41

4.19

+1.22

VFVA vs. ABLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the ABLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFVA and ABLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFVAABLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.80

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.71

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between VFVA and ABLD is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VFVA vs. ABLD - Dividend Comparison

VFVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than ABLD's 4.18% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
VFVA
Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF
2.10%2.13%2.40%2.45%2.21%1.68%2.04%2.08%1.65%
ABLD
Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF
4.18%2.86%10.13%4.70%8.40%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VFVA vs. ABLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFVA drawdown since its inception was -48.58%, which is greater than ABLD's maximum drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFVA and ABLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VFVAABLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.58%

-19.35%

-29.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.54%

-14.67%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.43%

-6.95%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.43%

-3.91%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

3.61%

+0.28%

Volatility

VFVA vs. ABLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Value Factor ETF (VFVA) is 4.34%, while Abacus FCF Real Assets Leaders ETF (ABLD) has a volatility of 7.45%. This indicates that VFVA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VFVAABLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

7.45%

-3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.07%

11.80%

-0.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.24%

18.51%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.26%

17.58%

+2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.51%

17.58%

+6.93%