PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFS vs. STLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VFS vs. STLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VinFast Auto Ltd (VFS) and Stellantis N.V. (STLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFS achieves a -5.39% return, which is significantly higher than STLA's -45.27% return.


VFS

1D
2.60%
1M
-11.48%
YTD
-5.39%
6M
-8.93%
1Y
-7.60%
3Y*
-32.62%
5Y*
10Y*

STLA

1D
-6.58%
1M
-21.68%
YTD
-45.27%
6M
-45.92%
1Y
-36.32%
3Y*
-22.81%
5Y*
-15.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFS vs. STLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VFS
VinFast Auto Ltd
-5.39%-17.12%-51.85%-16.30%3.20%-2.42%
STLA
Stellantis N.V.
-45.27%-0.80%-40.21%79.15%-18.23%-7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VFS and STLA is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2021

0.13

The correlation between VFS and STLA shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VFS:

$7.39B

STLA:

$16.60B

EPS

VFS:

-₫45.99K

STLA:

-€0.43

PS Ratio

VFS:

2.00

STLA:

0.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

VFS:

₫97.36T

STLA:

€186.57B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VFS:

-₫49.82T

STLA:

€86.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

VFS:

-₫75.40T

STLA:

€3.43B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFS vs. STLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFS
VFS Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
VFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFS Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFS Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

STLA
STLA Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
STLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
STLA Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
STLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
STLA Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFS vs. STLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VinFast Auto Ltd (VFS) and Stellantis N.V. (STLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFSSTLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.90

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

-0.72

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.53

-1.45

+0.92

VFS vs. STLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFS Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is higher than the STLA Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFS and STLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFS vs. STLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFS drawdown since its inception was -97.06%, which is greater than STLA's maximum drawdown of -74.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFS and STLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFSSTLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.06%

-74.25%

-22.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.13%

-50.83%

+14.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.06%

-74.25%

-22.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.16%

-74.25%

-21.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.19%

-29.31%

-26.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.42%

25.11%

-10.69%

Volatility

VFS vs. STLA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VinFast Auto Ltd (VFS) is 8.55%, while Stellantis N.V. (STLA) has a volatility of 15.12%. This indicates that VFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFSSTLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.55%

15.12%

-6.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.48%

41.10%

-10.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.63%

52.35%

-13.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

150.05%

42.20%

+107.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

150.05%

41.55%

+108.50%

Dividends

VFS vs. STLA - Dividend Comparison

Neither VFS nor STLA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
STLA
Stellantis N.V.
0.00%14.26%12.66%6.32%7.90%2.66%
VFS
VinFast Auto Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VFS vs. STLA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between VinFast Auto Ltd and Stellantis N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00T20.00T30.00T40.00T2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
23.24T
38.13B
(VFS) Total Revenue
(STLA) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. VFS values in VND, STLA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


VFS and STLA have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STLA has higher volatility (15.12%) compared to VFS (8.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFS dropped -97.06% vs STLA's -74.25%.

VFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFS and STLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer