PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFS vs. BYDDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VFS vs. BYDDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VinFast Auto Ltd (VFS) and BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFS achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly higher than BYDDY's -3.22% return.


VFS

1D
0.00%
1M
-19.71%
YTD
1.20%
6M
0.60%
1Y
0.30%
3Y*
-31.07%
5Y*
10Y*

BYDDY

1D
-3.46%
1M
-10.47%
YTD
-3.22%
6M
-6.76%
1Y
-30.88%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
20.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFS vs. BYDDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VFS
VinFast Auto Ltd
1.20%-17.12%-51.85%-16.30%3.20%-1.09%
BYDDY
BYD Company Limited ADR
-3.22%7.97%24.81%13.06%-27.17%-4.03%

Correlation

The correlation between VFS and BYDDY is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2021

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VFS:

$7.91B

BYDDY:

$106.85B

EPS

VFS:

-$41.41K

BYDDY:

$3.03

PS Ratio

VFS:

0.00

BYDDY:

0.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

VFS:

$90.27T

BYDDY:

$779.53B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VFS:

-$38.88T

BYDDY:

$132.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

VFS:

-$58.32T

BYDDY:

$33.66B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFS vs. BYDDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFS
VFS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFS Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
VFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

BYDDY
BYDDY Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BYDDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BYDDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BYDDY Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BYDDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
BYDDY Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFS vs. BYDDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VinFast Auto Ltd (VFS) and BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFSBYDDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.88

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

-0.82

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.02

-1.16

+1.19

VFS vs. BYDDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is higher than the BYDDY Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFS and BYDDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFSBYDDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

-0.82

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.13

0.17

-0.30

Drawdowns

VFS vs. BYDDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFS drawdown since its inception was -97.06%, roughly equal to the maximum BYDDY drawdown of -97.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFS and BYDDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFSBYDDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.06%

-97.38%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.99%

-37.83%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.06%

-42.29%

-54.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-95.90%

-39.99%

-55.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.49%

-63.78%

+8.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.14%

26.55%

-14.41%

Volatility

VFS vs. BYDDY - Volatility Comparison

VinFast Auto Ltd (VFS) and BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) have volatilities of 8.58% and 8.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFSBYDDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

8.89%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.33%

28.30%

+2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.06%

37.77%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

150.88%

45.97%

+104.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

150.88%

47.26%

+103.62%

Dividends

VFS vs. BYDDY - Dividend Comparison

VFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BYDDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BYDDY
BYD Company Limited ADR
1.50%1.45%1.26%0.60%0.07%0.07%0.03%0.47%0.28%0.52%1.92%
VFS
VinFast Auto Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VFS vs. BYDDY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between VinFast Auto Ltd and BYD Company Limited ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00T20.00T30.00T40.00TJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
39.34T
150.23B
(VFS) Total Revenue
(BYDDY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VFS vs. BYDDY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between VinFast Auto Ltd and BYD Company Limited ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-80.0%-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
-41.2%
18.8%
Portfolio components
VFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, VinFast Auto Ltd reported a gross profit of -16.20T and revenue of 39.34T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -41.2%.

BYDDY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported a gross profit of 28.25B and revenue of 150.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.8%.

VFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, VinFast Auto Ltd reported an operating income of -28.36T and revenue of 39.34T, resulting in an operating margin of -72.1%.

BYDDY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported an operating income of 7.18B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.8%.

VFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, VinFast Auto Ltd reported a net income of -35.04T and revenue of 39.34T, resulting in a net margin of -89.1%.

BYDDY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported a net income of 4.08B and revenue of 150.23B, resulting in a net margin of 2.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VFS and BYDDY have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BYDDY has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to VFS (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFS dropped -97.06% vs BYDDY's -97.38%.

VFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFS and BYDDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer