VFS vs. BYDDY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VinFast Auto Ltd (VFS) and BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY).

Performance

VFS vs. BYDDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VinFast Auto Ltd (VFS) and BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VFS vs. BYDDY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
VFS VinFast Auto Ltd	15.27%	-17.12%	-51.85%	-16.30%	3.20%	-1.09%
BYDDY BYD Company Limited ADR	12.55%	7.97%	24.81%	13.06%	-27.17%	-4.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap VFS : $9.01B BYDDY : $124.26B
EPS VFS : -$41.41K BYDDY : $3.60
PS Ratio VFS : 0.00 BYDDY : 0.15
Total Revenue (TTM) VFS : $90.27T BYDDY : $799.66B
Gross Profit (TTM) VFS : -$38.88T BYDDY : $138.56B
EBITDA (TTM) VFS : -$58.32T BYDDY : $39.74B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFS achieves a 15.27% return, which is significantly higher than BYDDY's 12.55% return.

VFS

• 1D: 6.65%
• 1M: 18.10%
• YTD: 15.27%
• 6M: 19.57%
• 1Y: 21.07%
• 3Y*: -27.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BYDDY

• 1D: 2.56%
• 1M: 13.49%
• YTD: 12.55%
• 6M: -3.26%
• 1Y: -18.49%
• 3Y*: 12.72%
• 5Y*: 13.28%
• 10Y*: 22.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

VFS vs. BYDDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFS

VFS Risk / Return Rank: 57
VFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
VFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
VFS Omega Ratio Rank: 54
VFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
VFS Martin Ratio Rank: 55

BYDDY

BYDDY Risk / Return Rank: 25
BYDDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
BYDDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BYDDY Omega Ratio Rank: 23
BYDDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
BYDDY Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFS vs. BYDDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VinFast Auto Ltd (VFS) and BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VFS	BYDDY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	-0.43	+0.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.05	-0.37	+1.42
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	0.96	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.54	-0.49	+1.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.29	-0.73	+2.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VFS vs. BYDDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the BYDDY Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFS and BYDDY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VFS	BYDDY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56	-0.43	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.12	0.19	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between VFS and BYDDY is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

VFS vs. BYDDY - Dividend Comparison

VFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BYDDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
VFS VinFast Auto Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BYDDY BYD Company Limited ADR	1.29%	1.45%	1.26%	0.60%	0.07%	0.07%	0.03%	0.47%	0.28%	0.52%	1.92%

Drawdowns

VFS vs. BYDDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFS drawdown since its inception was -97.06%, roughly equal to the maximum BYDDY drawdown of -97.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFS and BYDDY.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFS	BYDDY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.06%	-97.38%	+0.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.07%	-42.29%	+17.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-58.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.32%	-30.21%	-65.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.97%	-64.08%	+10.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.50%	28.34%	-17.84%

Volatility

VFS vs. BYDDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VinFast Auto Ltd (VFS) is 13.90%, while BYD Company Limited ADR (BYDDY) has a volatility of 16.60%. This indicates that VFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BYDDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFS	BYDDY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.90%	16.60%	-2.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.31%	27.70%	-1.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.60%	42.96%	-4.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	153.38%	46.23%	+107.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	153.38%	47.20%	+106.18%

Financials

VFS vs. BYDDY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between VinFast Auto Ltd and BYD Company Limited ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

VFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, VinFast Auto Ltd reported a gross profit of -16.20T and revenue of 39.34T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -41.2%.

BYDDY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported a gross profit of 37.53B and revenue of 234.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.0%.

VFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, VinFast Auto Ltd reported an operating income of -28.36T and revenue of 39.34T, resulting in an operating margin of -72.1%.

BYDDY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported an operating income of 9.51B and revenue of 234.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.

VFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, VinFast Auto Ltd reported a net income of -35.04T and revenue of 39.34T, resulting in a net margin of -89.1%.

BYDDY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, BYD Company Limited ADR reported a net income of 9.16B and revenue of 234.42B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.