VFS vs. ^GSPC
VFS (VinFast Auto Ltd) is a stock, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 3 years, VFS returned -34.39%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for ^GSPC. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
VFS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFS achieves a -6.89% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 9.41% return.
VFS
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- 6M
- -5.76%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 1Y
- -8.26%
- 3Y*
- -34.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -21.11%
^GSPC
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | $37.98T | $37.61T | $41.48T |
| $1.27M | $1.27M | $1.68M |
VFS vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFS VinFast Auto Ltd | -6.89% | -17.12% | -51.85% | -16.30% | 3.20% | -2.42% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 9.41% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 5.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFS and ^GSPC is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2021 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFS vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
VFS
^GSPC
VFS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VinFast Auto Ltd (VFS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFS | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.25 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.23 | 2.00 | -2.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 8.49 | -9.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFS drawdown since its inception was -97.06%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFS and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFS | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.06% | -56.78% | -40.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.13% | -9.10% | -31.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -97.06% | -18.90% | -78.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.43% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -96.22% | -1.58% | -94.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.07% | -10.70% | -46.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.96% | 2.14% | +14.82% |
Volatility
VFS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
VinFast Auto Ltd (VFS) has a higher volatility of 10.62% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 3.51%. This indicates that VFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFS | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.62% | 3.51% | +7.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.20% | 10.11% | +21.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.06% | 12.87% | +26.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.48% | 17.01% | +131.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.48% | 18.07% | +130.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFS and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFS has higher volatility (10.62%) compared to ^GSPC (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFS dropped -97.06% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFS and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer