PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STLA vs. OSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STLA vs. OSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stellantis N.V. (STLA) and Oshkosh Corporation (OSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STLA achieves a -32.51% return, which is significantly lower than OSK's 7.54% return.


STLA

1D
-4.30%
1M
3.81%
YTD
-32.51%
6M
-35.86%
1Y
-25.76%
3Y*
-16.21%
5Y*
-12.06%
10Y*

OSK

1D
1.70%
1M
-10.16%
YTD
7.54%
6M
5.42%
1Y
33.05%
3Y*
19.90%
5Y*
2.07%
10Y*
12.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STLA vs. OSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
STLA
Stellantis N.V.
-32.51%-0.80%-40.21%79.15%-18.23%13.08%
OSK
Oshkosh Corporation
7.54%34.49%-10.83%25.23%-20.49%19.35%

Correlation

The correlation between STLA and OSK is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2021

0.46

The correlation between STLA and OSK shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STLA:

$20.48B

OSK:

$63.93B

EPS

STLA:

-$0.43

OSK:

$2.08

PS Ratio

STLA:

0.11

OSK:

3.58

PB Ratio

STLA:

0.34

OSK:

6.42

Total Revenue (TTM)

STLA:

$186.57B

OSK:

$10.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STLA:

$86.70B

OSK:

$1.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

STLA:

$3.43B

OSK:

$1.04B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STLA vs. OSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STLA
STLA Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
STLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
STLA Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
STLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
STLA Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

OSK
OSK Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
OSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
OSK Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
OSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
OSK Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STLA vs. OSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellantis N.V. (STLA) and Oshkosh Corporation (OSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STLAOSKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.50

0.86

-1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.42

1.42

-1.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.18

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

1.00

-1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.12

2.82

-3.94

STLA vs. OSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STLA Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the OSK Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STLA and OSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STLAOSKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.50

0.86

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.29

0.06

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.18

0.34

-0.52

Drawdowns

STLA vs. OSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STLA drawdown since its inception was -72.65%, smaller than the maximum OSK drawdown of -93.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STLA and OSK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STLAOSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.65%

-93.84%

+21.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.77%

-33.06%

-14.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.65%

-36.66%

-35.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.65%

-45.57%

-27.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.25%

-24.33%

-43.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.93%

-23.21%

-5.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.10%

11.75%

+11.35%

Volatility

STLA vs. OSK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stellantis N.V. (STLA) is 13.68%, while Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) has a volatility of 16.08%. This indicates that STLA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STLAOSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.68%

16.08%

-2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.02%

31.08%

+8.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.35%

38.87%

+12.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.89%

34.26%

+7.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.37%

35.28%

+6.09%

Dividends

STLA vs. OSK - Dividend Comparison

STLA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OSK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OSK
Oshkosh Corporation
1.61%1.62%1.94%1.51%1.68%1.21%1.43%1.17%1.61%0.96%1.21%1.74%
STLA
Stellantis N.V.
0.00%14.26%12.66%6.32%7.90%2.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

STLA vs. OSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stellantis N.V. and Oshkosh Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B202120222023202420252026
38.13B
2.32B
(STLA) Total Revenue
(OSK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

STLA vs. OSK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stellantis N.V. and Oshkosh Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
11.6%
0
Portfolio components
STLA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stellantis N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.43B and revenue of 38.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.6%.

OSK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Oshkosh Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 2.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

STLA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stellantis N.V. reported an operating income of 688.00M and revenue of 38.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.8%.

OSK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Oshkosh Corporation reported an operating income of 82.00M and revenue of 2.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.5%.

STLA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stellantis N.V. reported a net income of 390.00M and revenue of 38.13B, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.

OSK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Oshkosh Corporation reported a net income of 43.10M and revenue of 2.32B, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STLA and OSK have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OSK has higher volatility (16.08%) compared to STLA (13.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STLA dropped -72.65% vs OSK's -93.84%.

OSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STLA and OSK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer