VFMV vs. VFMO
VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) and VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while VFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFMV returned 9.87%/yr vs 14.03%/yr for VFMO. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.13% expense ratio.
Performance
VFMV vs. VFMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than VFMO's 24.71% return.
VFMV
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 8.76%
- 6M
- 8.41%
- 1Y
- 13.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.06%
- 5Y*
- 9.87%
- 10Y*
- —
VFMO
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 24.71%
- 6M
- 22.49%
- 1Y
- 44.76%
- 3Y*
- 28.43%
- 5Y*
- 14.03%
- 10Y*
- —
VFMV vs. VFMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 8.76% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -1.10% |
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 24.71% | 17.39% | 26.14% | 16.25% | -12.84% | 19.16% | 31.36% | 28.22% | -11.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMV and VFMO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between VFMV and VFMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VFMV vs. VFMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFMV
VFMO
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VFMV
VFMO
Communication Services
VFMV
VFMO
Financial Services
VFMV
VFMO
Industrials
VFMV
VFMO
Healthcare
VFMV
VFMO
Consumer Defensive
VFMV
VFMO
Consumer Cyclical
VFMV
VFMO
Utilities
VFMV
VFMO
Real Estate
VFMV
VFMO
Energy
VFMV
VFMO
Basic Materials
VFMV
-
VFMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMV vs. VFMO — Risk / Return Rank
VFMV
VFMO
VFMV vs. VFMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFMV | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.36 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 4.09 | -1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 15.46 | -6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFMV | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 2.12 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.65 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.66 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
VFMV vs. VFMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, smaller than the maximum VFMO drawdown of -36.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and VFMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMV | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -36.77% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.00% | -10.98% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | -24.40% | +14.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.41% | -25.80% | +10.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | 0.00% | -0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -7.76% | +4.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 2.90% | -1.37% |
Volatility
VFMV vs. VFMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) is 2.04%, while Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a volatility of 6.05%. This indicates that VFMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMV | VFMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | 6.05% | -4.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.30% | 16.38% | -10.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.80% | 21.21% | -12.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 21.70% | -9.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 23.56% | -9.31% |
VFMV vs. VFMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VFMV and VFMO have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFMV vs. VFMO - Dividend Comparison
VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than VFMO's 0.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.62% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.93% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFMV and VFMO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFMO has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to VFMV (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMV dropped -33.64% vs VFMO's -36.77%.
On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 14.03% vs 9.87% for VFMV. Both ETFs have the same 0.13% expense ratio. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 14.03% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV and VFMO have the same expense ratio: 0.13% per year.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.62% for VFMO.
VFMV is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VFMO is Momentum.
VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFMV and VFMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer