VFMV vs. TCAF
VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) and TCAF (T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while TCAF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, VFMV returned 12.36% vs 16.10% for TCAF. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VFMV charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for TCAF.
Performance
VFMV vs. TCAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than TCAF's 4.37% return.
VFMV
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 7.81%
- 1Y
- 12.36%
- 3Y*
- 14.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- —
TCAF
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- YTD
- 4.37%
- 6M
- 5.06%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFMV vs. TCAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 8.57% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 6.71% |
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF | 4.37% | 15.45% | 20.93% | 9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMV and TCAF is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2023 | 0.72 |
The correlation between VFMV and TCAF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
VFMV vs. TCAF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFMV
TCAF
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VFMV
TCAF
Communication Services
VFMV
TCAF
Financial Services
VFMV
TCAF
Industrials
VFMV
TCAF
Healthcare
VFMV
TCAF
Consumer Defensive
VFMV
TCAF
Consumer Cyclical
VFMV
TCAF
Utilities
VFMV
TCAF
Real Estate
VFMV
TCAF
Energy
VFMV
TCAF
Basic Materials
VFMV
-
TCAF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMV vs. TCAF — Risk / Return Rank
VFMV
TCAF
VFMV vs. TCAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFMV | TCAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.43 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.03 | 5.64 | +2.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFMV vs. TCAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, which is greater than TCAF's maximum drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and TCAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMV | TCAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -16.37% | -17.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.00% | -11.33% | +5.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -2.97% | +1.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -2.07% | -1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 2.86% | -1.31% |
Volatility
VFMV vs. TCAF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) is 2.30%, while T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF (TCAF) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that VFMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TCAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMV | TCAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 3.60% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.32% | 9.20% | -2.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.83% | 11.77% | -2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 13.98% | -2.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 13.98% | +0.25% |
VFMV vs. TCAF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFMV has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than TCAF's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFMV vs. TCAF - Dividend Comparison
VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than TCAF's 0.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TCAF T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Equity ETF | 0.48% | 0.50% | 0.43% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.93% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFMV and TCAF have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TCAF has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to VFMV (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMV dropped -33.64% vs TCAF's -16.37%.
On 1-year performance, TCAF leads with 16.10% vs 12.36% for VFMV. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TCAF has performed better with a 16.10% return vs 12.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for TCAF.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.48% for TCAF.
VFMV is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while TCAF is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMV and 0.31% for TCAF.
VFMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFMV and TCAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer