PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMV vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMV vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.45% return.


VFMV

1D
0.21%
1M
0.96%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.41%
1Y
13.49%
3Y*
15.06%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*

SPMO

1D
-1.46%
1M
10.84%
YTD
28.45%
6M
27.50%
1Y
43.92%
3Y*
42.27%
5Y*
23.92%
10Y*
20.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMV vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
8.76%10.52%16.91%8.86%-5.73%20.75%-0.19%27.26%-1.10%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
28.45%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%28.25%25.93%-6.31%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMV and SPMO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between VFMV and SPMO has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VFMV vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFMV
SPMO

Technology

25.1%
52.6%

Communication Services

10.7%
9.2%

Financial Services

10.6%
5.9%

Industrials

10.1%
11.3%

Healthcare

10.1%
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

9.5%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
1.3%

Utilities

6.7%
2.8%

Real Estate

6.4%
1.0%

Energy

3.9%
3.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Technology

VFMV
25.1%
SPMO
52.6%

Communication Services

VFMV
10.7%
SPMO
9.2%

Financial Services

VFMV
10.6%
SPMO
5.9%

Industrials

VFMV
10.1%
SPMO
11.3%

Healthcare

VFMV
10.1%
SPMO
6.7%

Consumer Defensive

VFMV
9.5%
SPMO
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VFMV
6.9%
SPMO
1.3%

Utilities

VFMV
6.7%
SPMO
2.8%

Real Estate

VFMV
6.4%
SPMO
1.0%

Energy

VFMV
3.9%
SPMO
3.4%

Basic Materials

VFMV

-

SPMO
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMV vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMV vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFMVSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.44

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.47

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.85

13.52

-4.67

VFMV vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMV and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFMVSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

2.49

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

1.25

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.00

-0.31

Drawdowns

VFMV vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMVSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-30.95%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.00%

-12.70%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

-20.13%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

-22.74%

+7.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

-1.46%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-4.60%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.53%

3.26%

-1.73%

Volatility

VFMV vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) is 2.04%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that VFMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMVSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.04%

7.39%

-5.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.30%

14.49%

-8.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.80%

17.70%

-8.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.75%

19.30%

-7.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.25%

20.31%

-6.06%

VFMV vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VFMV and SPMO have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFMV vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than SPMO's 0.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.66%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
1.93%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFMV and SPMO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to VFMV (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMV dropped -33.64% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 23.92% vs 9.87% for VFMV. Both ETFs have the same 0.13% expense ratio. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 23.92% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VFMV and SPMO have the same expense ratio: 0.13% per year.

VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.66% for SPMO.

VFMV is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMV and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer