VFMV vs. PRCPX

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) and PRCPX (T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund) are both funds - VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while PRCPX is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US High-Yield 2% Issuer Capped Bond Index. VFMV is actively managed, while PRCPX is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFMV returned 9.55%/yr vs 5.53%/yr for PRCPX. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VFMV charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for PRCPX.

Performance

VFMV vs. PRCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than PRCPX's 1.54% return.

VFMV

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 8.57%
• 6M: 7.81%
• 1Y: 12.36%
• 3Y*: 14.22%
• 5Y*: 9.55%
• 10Y*: —

PRCPX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: 3.01%
• 1Y: 9.12%
• 3Y*: 10.51%
• 5Y*: 5.53%
• 10Y*: 6.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMV vs. PRCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF	8.57%	10.52%	16.91%	8.86%	-5.73%	20.75%	-0.19%	27.26%	-0.34%
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund	1.54%	11.51%	9.36%	14.90%	-10.50%	6.36%	5.55%	13.77%	-0.63%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMV and PRCPX is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2018	0.40

Return for Risk

VFMV vs. PRCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMV

VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 47
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 43
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

PRCPX

PRCPX Risk / Return Rank: 95
PRCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
PRCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PRCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 94
PRCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PRCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMV vs. PRCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VFMV	PRCPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	2.81	-1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	5.27	-3.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.70	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	4.68	-2.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.03	22.07	-14.04

VFMV vs. PRCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the PRCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMV and PRCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VFMV vs. PRCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, which is greater than PRCPX's maximum drawdown of -23.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and PRCPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFMV	PRCPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.64%	-23.07%	-10.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.00%	-1.99%	-4.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.35%	-3.83%	-6.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.41%	-14.34%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-23.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.98%	-0.37%	-0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-3.11%	-0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.55%	0.42%	+1.13%

Volatility

VFMV vs. PRCPX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) at 0.94%. This indicates that VFMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFMV	PRCPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.30%	0.94%	+1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.32%	2.41%	+3.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.83%	3.31%	+5.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.75%	4.81%	+6.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.23%	5.45%	+8.78%

VFMV vs. PRCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMV has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCPX's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

VFMV vs. PRCPX - Dividend Comparison

VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than PRCPX's 9.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund	9.30%	9.32%	8.77%	7.88%	4.89%	5.11%	5.36%	5.18%	5.72%	4.95%	5.88%	7.58%
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF	1.93%	2.12%	1.46%	2.20%	2.08%	1.31%	2.14%	2.43%	2.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFMV and PRCPX in my portfolio?

VFMV and PRCPX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VFMV or PRCPX?

VFMV has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to PRCPX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMV dropped -33.64% vs PRCPX's -23.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.