PRCPX vs. SICNX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) and Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX).
PRCPX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High-Yield 2% Issuer Capped Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014. SICNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on May 30, 2008.
Performance
PRCPX vs. SICNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PRCPX vs. SICNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | -0.13% | 14.80% | 7.46% | 14.90% | -10.50% | 6.36% | 5.55% | 13.77% | -1.44% | 6.80% |
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | -1.18% | 31.57% | 9.04% | 20.00% | -15.31% | 11.01% | 4.64% | 19.16% | -18.30% | 25.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PRCPX achieves a -0.13% return, which is significantly higher than SICNX's -1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PRCPX has underperformed SICNX with an annualized return of 6.83%, while SICNX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.05% annualized return.
PRCPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.62%
- YTD
- -0.13%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- 1Y
- 13.68%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.83%
SICNX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -11.74%
- YTD
- -1.18%
- 6M
- -0.46%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- 16.22%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- 8.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PRCPX vs. SICNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRCPX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is lower than SICNX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PRCPX vs. SICNX — Risk / Return Rank
PRCPX
SICNX
PRCPX vs. SICNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) and Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PRCPX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.47 | 0.99 | +2.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.52 | 1.34 | +4.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.93 | 1.21 | +0.72 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 1.40 | +3.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.08 | 5.20 | +15.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRCPX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47 | 0.99 | +2.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 0.60 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.26 | 0.49 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.24 | +0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between PRCPX and SICNX is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PRCPX vs. SICNX - Dividend Comparison
PRCPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.89%, while SICNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | 12.89% | 12.19% | 7.03% | 7.88% | 4.89% | 5.11% | 5.36% | 5.18% | 5.72% | 4.95% | 5.88% | 7.58% |
SICNX Schwab International Core Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.61% | 2.67% | 3.42% | 2.86% | 1.03% | 3.56% | 2.86% | 2.61% | 2.50% | 2.04% |
Drawdowns
PRCPX vs. SICNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRCPX drawdown since its inception was -23.07%, smaller than the maximum SICNX drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRCPX and SICNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRCPX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.07% | -55.78% | +32.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.03% | -12.21% | +9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.34% | -29.11% | +14.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.07% | -40.62% | +17.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -11.74% | +10.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.16% | -12.28% | +9.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.65% | 3.30% | -2.65% |
Volatility
PRCPX vs. SICNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) is 1.10%, while Schwab International Core Equity Fund (SICNX) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that PRCPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SICNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PRCPX | SICNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 7.41% | -6.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.52% | 12.85% | -10.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.11% | 18.08% | -13.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.79% | 15.87% | -11.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.45% | 16.38% | -10.93% |