PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMV vs. PRCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMV vs. PRCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I (PRCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than PRCHX's 2.61% return.


VFMV

1D
0.40%
1M
1.39%
YTD
8.57%
6M
7.81%
1Y
12.36%
3Y*
14.22%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*

PRCHX

1D
0.68%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
2.61%
6M
3.48%
1Y
11.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMV vs. PRCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
8.57%10.52%16.91%4.59%
PRCHX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I
2.61%13.68%8.92%3.12%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMV and PRCHX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023

0.70

The correlation between VFMV and PRCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMV vs. PRCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMV
VFMV Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
VFMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

PRCHX
PRCHX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PRCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PRCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMV vs. PRCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I (PRCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VFMVPRCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.41

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

2.63

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.03

12.99

-4.96

VFMV vs. PRCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the PRCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMV and PRCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VFMV vs. PRCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, which is greater than PRCHX's maximum drawdown of -6.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and PRCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMVPRCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-6.10%

-27.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.00%

-4.50%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-1.37%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-0.65%

-2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

0.91%

+0.64%

Volatility

VFMV vs. PRCHX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I (PRCHX) at 2.18%. This indicates that VFMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMVPRCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

2.18%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.32%

4.44%

+1.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.83%

5.46%

+3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.75%

6.56%

+5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.23%

6.56%

+7.67%

VFMV vs. PRCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMV has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCHX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

VFMV vs. PRCHX - Dividend Comparison

VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than PRCHX's 5.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PRCHX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation and Income Fund Class I
5.20%5.08%3.22%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VFMV
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF
1.93%2.12%1.46%2.20%2.08%1.31%2.14%2.43%2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFMV and PRCHX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFMV has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to PRCHX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMV dropped -33.64% vs PRCHX's -6.10%.

PRCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMV and PRCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer