VFMV vs. FBND
VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFMV returned 9.52%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for FBND. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VFMV charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.
Performance
VFMV vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFMV achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.10% return.
VFMV
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 7.72%
- 1Y
- 11.60%
- 3Y*
- 13.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- —
FBND
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- 4.60%
- 5Y*
- 0.68%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
VFMV vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 7.46% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -1.10% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 0.10% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | 1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMV and FBND is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.22 |
The correlation between VFMV and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VFMV vs. FBND - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFMV
FBND
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Technology
VFMV
FBND
-
Communication Services
VFMV
FBND
-
Financial Services
VFMV
FBND
Industrials
VFMV
FBND
Healthcare
VFMV
FBND
-
Consumer Defensive
VFMV
FBND
-
Consumer Cyclical
VFMV
FBND
-
Utilities
VFMV
FBND
Real Estate
VFMV
FBND
-
Energy
VFMV
FBND
Basic Materials
VFMV
-
FBND
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMV vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
VFMV
FBND
VFMV vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFMV | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 2.01 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.57 | 5.97 | +1.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFMV | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.12 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.44 | +0.25 |
Drawdowns
VFMV vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMV drawdown since its inception was -33.64%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMV and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMV | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -17.25% | -16.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.00% | -2.66% | -3.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | -5.94% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.41% | -17.25% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -1.82% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -3.35% | -0.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 0.90% | +0.63% |
Volatility
VFMV vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.23%. This indicates that VFMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMV | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 1.23% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.37% | 2.75% | +3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.83% | 3.80% | +5.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.75% | 5.92% | +5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.25% | 6.10% | +8.15% |
VFMV vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFMV has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFMV vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
VFMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than FBND's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.72% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.95% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFMV and FBND have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFMV has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to FBND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMV dropped -33.64% vs FBND's -17.25%.
On 5-year performance, VFMV leads with 9.52% vs 0.68% for FBND. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, FBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMV has performed better with a 9.52% return vs 0.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for FBND.
FBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 1.95% for VFMV.
VFMV is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while FBND is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for VFMV and 0.36% for FBND.
FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFMV and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer