PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMO vs. VSVNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMO vs. VSVNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2070 Fund (VSVNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMO achieves a 24.71% return, which is significantly higher than VSVNX's 11.35% return.


VFMO

1D
0.84%
1M
4.64%
YTD
24.71%
6M
22.49%
1Y
44.76%
3Y*
28.43%
5Y*
14.03%
10Y*

VSVNX

1D
-0.73%
1M
3.54%
YTD
11.35%
6M
12.10%
1Y
26.98%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMO vs. VSVNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
24.71%17.39%26.14%16.25%8.69%
VSVNX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2070 Fund
11.35%21.43%14.38%20.45%1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMO and VSVNX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2022

0.84

The correlation between VFMO and VSVNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFMO vs. VSVNX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFMO
VSVNX

Industrials

24.7%
12.4%

Healthcare

22.9%
8.3%

Technology

17.5%
27.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
9.4%

Energy

7.3%
4.3%

Financial Services

6.5%
16.1%

Basic Materials

6.4%
4.3%

Communication Services

3.4%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
4.8%

Utilities

0.2%
2.7%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.5%

Industrials

VFMO
24.7%
VSVNX
12.4%

Healthcare

VFMO
22.9%
VSVNX
8.3%

Technology

VFMO
17.5%
VSVNX
27.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VFMO
8.7%
VSVNX
9.4%

Energy

VFMO
7.3%
VSVNX
4.3%

Financial Services

VFMO
6.5%
VSVNX
16.1%

Basic Materials

VFMO
6.4%
VSVNX
4.3%

Communication Services

VFMO
3.4%
VSVNX
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

VFMO
2.5%
VSVNX
4.8%

Utilities

VFMO
0.2%
VSVNX
2.7%

Real Estate

VFMO
0.1%
VSVNX
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMO vs. VSVNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMO
VFMO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
VFMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VSVNX
VSVNX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VSVNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSVNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSVNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VSVNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSVNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMO vs. VSVNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Vanguard Target Retirement 2070 Fund (VSVNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFMOVSVNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.44

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

3.07

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.46

13.64

+1.83

VFMO vs. VSVNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMO Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the VSVNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMO and VSVNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFMOVSVNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.40

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

1.32

-0.66

Drawdowns

VFMO vs. VSVNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMO drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, which is greater than VSVNX's maximum drawdown of -15.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMO and VSVNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMOVSVNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.77%

-15.39%

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.98%

-8.94%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.40%

-14.53%

-9.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.76%

-2.50%

-5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.01%

+0.89%

Volatility

VFMO vs. VSVNX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to Vanguard Target Retirement 2070 Fund (VSVNX) at 3.48%. This indicates that VFMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSVNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMOVSVNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.05%

3.48%

+2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.38%

9.11%

+7.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.21%

11.43%

+9.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.70%

13.69%

+8.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.56%

13.69%

+9.87%

VFMO vs. VSVNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMO has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VSVNX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFMO vs. VSVNX - Dividend Comparison

VFMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, less than VSVNX's 1.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMO
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.62%0.82%0.72%0.89%1.72%0.81%0.45%1.22%0.70%
VSVNX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2070 Fund
1.63%1.82%1.79%1.57%0.91%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFMO and VSVNX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VFMO has higher volatility (6.05%) compared to VSVNX (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMO dropped -36.77% vs VSVNX's -15.39%.

VSVNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMO and VSVNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer