VFMO vs. VFMV
VFMO (Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Vanguard, while VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VFMO returned 13.84%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for VFMV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.13% expense ratio.
Performance
VFMO vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFMO achieves a 23.68% return, which is significantly higher than VFMV's 8.53% return.
VFMO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 23.68%
- 6M
- 23.37%
- 1Y
- 43.34%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 13.84%
- 10Y*
- —
VFMV
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 13.05%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
VFMO vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 23.68% | 17.39% | 26.14% | 16.25% | -12.84% | 19.16% | 31.36% | 28.22% | -11.41% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 8.53% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMO and VFMV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between VFMO and VFMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VFMO vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VFMO
VFMV
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
VFMO
VFMV
Healthcare
VFMO
VFMV
Technology
VFMO
VFMV
Consumer Cyclical
VFMO
VFMV
Energy
VFMO
VFMV
Financial Services
VFMO
VFMV
Basic Materials
VFMO
VFMV
-
Communication Services
VFMO
VFMV
Consumer Defensive
VFMO
VFMV
Utilities
VFMO
VFMV
Real Estate
VFMO
VFMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMO vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
VFMO
VFMV
VFMO vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFMO | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.26 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.96 | 2.18 | +1.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.97 | 8.57 | +6.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFMO | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.49 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.84 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.69 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
VFMO vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMO drawdown since its inception was -36.77%, which is greater than VFMV's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMO and VFMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMO | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.77% | -33.64% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.98% | -6.00% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.40% | -10.35% | -14.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | -15.41% | -10.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.02% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.77% | -3.64% | -4.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 1.53% | +1.37% |
Volatility
VFMO vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (VFMO) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.09%. This indicates that VFMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMO | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 2.09% | +4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.37% | 6.30% | +10.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.20% | 8.80% | +12.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 11.75% | +9.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 14.25% | +9.32% |
VFMO vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VFMO and VFMV have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFMO vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
VFMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than VFMV's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFMO Vanguard U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.63% | 0.82% | 0.72% | 0.89% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 1.22% | 0.70% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.93% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFMO and VFMV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFMO has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to VFMV (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMO dropped -36.77% vs VFMV's -33.64%.
On 5-year performance, VFMO leads with 13.84% vs 9.82% for VFMV. Both ETFs have the same 0.13% expense ratio. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VFMO has performed better with a 13.84% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMO and VFMV have the same expense ratio: 0.13% per year.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.93%, compared with 0.63% for VFMO.
VFMO is categorized as Momentum, while VFMV is Mid Cap Blend Equities.
VFMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFMO and VFMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer