PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VFMF vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VFMF vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFMF achieves a 16.18% return, which is significantly higher than VXUS's 14.45% return.


VFMF

1D
1.15%
1M
2.93%
YTD
16.18%
6M
17.39%
1Y
35.69%
3Y*
23.25%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*

VXUS

1D
0.17%
1M
3.40%
YTD
14.45%
6M
16.87%
1Y
31.38%
3Y*
19.55%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFMF vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
16.18%17.38%15.60%18.52%-5.70%30.05%4.99%22.34%-11.29%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
14.45%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between VFMF and VXUS is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2018

0.75

The correlation between VFMF and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

VFMF vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VFMF
VXUS

Financial Services

24.6%
22.3%

Healthcare

16.9%
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
8.4%

Technology

12.7%
18.1%

Industrials

9.0%
16.1%

Energy

7.3%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
5.0%

Communication Services

5.0%
4.4%

Basic Materials

3.4%
7.6%

Real Estate

0.3%
2.6%

Utilities

0.2%
3.2%

Financial Services

VFMF
24.6%
VXUS
22.3%

Healthcare

VFMF
16.9%
VXUS
7.1%

Consumer Cyclical

VFMF
13.6%
VXUS
8.4%

Technology

VFMF
12.7%
VXUS
18.1%

Industrials

VFMF
9.0%
VXUS
16.1%

Energy

VFMF
7.3%
VXUS
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

VFMF
6.8%
VXUS
5.0%

Communication Services

VFMF
5.0%
VXUS
4.4%

Basic Materials

VFMF
3.4%
VXUS
7.6%

Real Estate

VFMF
0.3%
VXUS
2.6%

Utilities

VFMF
0.2%
VXUS
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VFMF vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFMF
VFMF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VFMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VFMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFMF vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VFMFVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.38

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.07

2.80

+2.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.02

10.92

+8.10

VFMF vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFMF and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VFMFVXUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.08

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.53

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.39

+0.19

Drawdowns

VFMF vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFMF drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMF and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VFMFVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.34%

-35.97%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-11.27%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-13.58%

-6.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.57%

-29.44%

+8.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.82%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-8.22%

+2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.88%

-1.00%

Volatility

VFMF vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) is 2.93%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that VFMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VFMFVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

5.46%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

13.00%

-3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

15.20%

-2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

16.04%

+2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.15%

17.15%

+4.00%

VFMF vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFMF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VFMF vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

VFMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than VXUS's 2.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VFMF
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF
1.36%1.54%1.60%1.78%2.21%1.39%1.56%1.61%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.65%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


VFMF and VXUS have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXUS has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to VFMF (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMF dropped -41.34% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 5-year performance, VFMF leads with 13.18% vs 8.49% for VXUS. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VFMF has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VFMF has performed better with a 13.18% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for VFMF.

VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 1.36% for VFMF.

VFMF is categorized as Multi-factor, while VXUS is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for VFMF and 0.05% for VXUS.

VFMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VFMF and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer