VFMF vs. CSHP
VFMF (Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFMF is a Multi-factor fund actively managed by Vanguard, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, VFMF returned 33.74% vs 3.89% for CSHP. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VFMF charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.
Performance
VFMF vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFMF achieves a 16.90% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.79% return.
VFMF
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 16.90%
- 6M
- 15.05%
- 1Y
- 33.74%
- 3Y*
- 22.48%
- 5Y*
- 13.67%
- 10Y*
- —
CSHP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VFMF vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VFMF Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF | 16.90% | 17.38% | 1.91% |
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 1.79% | 4.10% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFMF and CSHP is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024 | 0.03 |
The correlation between VFMF and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFMF vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank
VFMF
CSHP
VFMF vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFMF | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -22.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 6.09 | -4.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.79 | 48.60 | -43.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.00 | 338.28 | -320.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFMF vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFMF drawdown since its inception was -41.34%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFMF and CSHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFMF | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.34% | -0.08% | -41.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.08% | -0.08% | -7.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -0.08% | -0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -0.00% | -5.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 0.01% | +1.87% |
Volatility
VFMF vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF (VFMF) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that VFMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFMF | CSHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 0.16% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.30% | 0.27% | +9.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.18% | 0.36% | +12.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 0.41% | +17.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.11% | 0.41% | +20.70% |
VFMF vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFMF has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VFMF vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison
VFMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than CSHP's 3.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF | 3.92% | 5.39% | 1.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFMF Vanguard U.S. Multifactor ETF | 1.00% | 1.54% | 1.60% | 1.78% | 2.21% | 1.39% | 1.56% | 1.61% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFMF and CSHP have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFMF has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFMF dropped -41.34% vs CSHP's -0.08%.
On 1-year performance, VFMF leads with 33.74% vs 3.89% for CSHP. On fees, VFMF is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VFMF has performed better with a 33.74% return vs 3.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMF is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 1.00% for VFMF.
VFMF is categorized as Multi-factor, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for VFMF and 0.20% for CSHP.
CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.81 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFMF and CSHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer