VFLO vs. UITB
VFLO (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF) and UITB (VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFLO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while UITB is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Victory. VFLO is passively managed, while UITB is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VFLO returned 25.26%/yr vs 4.35%/yr for UITB. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VFLO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for UITB.
Performance
VFLO vs. UITB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFLO achieves a 27.47% return, which is significantly higher than UITB's -0.31% return.
VFLO
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- 6M
- 26.76%
- YTD
- 27.47%
- 1Y
- 47.53%
- 3Y*
- 25.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.88%
UITB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 1Y
- 2.00%
- 3Y*
- 4.35%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.15M | $6.47M | $6.75M | |
| $87.61M | $73.14M | $52.34M |
VFLO vs. UITB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF | 27.47% | 17.51% | 21.83% | 15.05% |
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | -0.31% | 7.32% | 1.81% | 3.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFLO and UITB is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFLO vs. UITB — Risk / Return Rank
VFLO
UITB
VFLO vs. UITB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFLO | UITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.10 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.41 | 0.72 | +6.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.91 | 1.82 | +23.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFLO vs. UITB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFLO drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, roughly equal to the maximum UITB drawdown of -17.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFLO and UITB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFLO | UITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | -17.02% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -2.80% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.79% | -4.75% | -13.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -2.09% | +1.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.43% | -4.29% | +1.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.91% | 1.10% | +0.81% |
Volatility
VFLO vs. UITB - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF (UITB) at 0.96%. This indicates that VFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UITB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFLO | UITB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 0.96% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 2.83% | +9.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.41% | 3.51% | +11.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 5.66% | +10.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 4.96% | +11.01% |
VFLO vs. UITB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFLO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than UITB's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
VFLO vs. UITB - Dividend Comparison
VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than UITB's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UITB VictoryShares Core Intermediate Bond ETF | 4.24% | 4.04% | 3.89% | 3.14% | 2.32% | 1.95% | 2.79% | 3.01% | 2.99% | 0.50% |
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.07% | 1.60% | 1.20% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VFLO and UITB have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFLO has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to UITB (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFLO dropped -17.79% vs UITB's -17.02%.
On 3-year performance, VFLO leads with 25.26% vs 4.35% for UITB. On fees, UITB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, UITB has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VFLO has performed better with a 25.26% return vs 4.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UITB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for VFLO.
UITB has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 1.07% for VFLO.
VFLO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while UITB is Intermediate Core Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VFLO and 0.38% for UITB.
VFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.11 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFLO and UITB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer