VFLO vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

VFLO (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFLO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, VFLO returned 31.09% vs 4.38% for IBIC. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VFLO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

VFLO vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFLO achieves a 15.45% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.39% return.

VFLO

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 2.66%
• YTD: 15.45%
• 6M: 14.26%
• 1Y: 31.09%
• 3Y*: 23.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 2.39%
• 6M: 2.49%
• 1Y: 4.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFLO vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	15.45%	17.51%	21.83%	6.96%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.39%	4.96%	5.25%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between VFLO and IBIC is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023	0.02

Return for Risk

VFLO vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFLO

VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 71
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 59
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFLO vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VFLO	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	4.94	-2.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	8.90	-6.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	2.21	-0.86
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.85	16.41	-11.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.19	58.11	-41.92

VFLO vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFLO Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFLO and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VFLO vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFLO drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFLO and IBIC.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFLO	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.79%	-0.90%	-16.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.44%	-0.27%	-6.17%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.86%	-0.11%	-5.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.45%	-0.10%	-2.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	0.08%	+1.85%

Volatility

VFLO vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.16%. This indicates that VFLO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFLO	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.63%	0.16%	+7.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.88%	0.67%	+11.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.69%	0.89%	+14.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	1.57%	+14.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.06%	1.57%	+14.49%

VFLO vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFLO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

VFLO vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.59%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	1.16%	1.60%	1.20%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFLO and IBIC in my portfolio?

VFLO and IBIC have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VFLO or IBIC?

VFLO has higher volatility (7.63%) compared to IBIC (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFLO dropped -17.79% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

Which ETF is better, VFLO or IBIC?

On 1-year performance, VFLO leads with 31.09% vs 4.38% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VFLO or IBIC?

Over the 1-year period, VFLO has performed better with a 31.09% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VFLO or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for VFLO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VFLO or IBIC?

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.16% for VFLO.

What is the main difference between VFLO and IBIC?

VFLO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. VFLO tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VFLO and 0.10% for IBIC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.