VFLO vs. FMTM

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

VFLO (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF) and FMTM (MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VFLO is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Victory U.S. Large Cap Free Cash Flow Index, while FMTM is a Momentum fund. VFLO is passively managed, while FMTM is actively managed. Over the past year, VFLO returned 34.02% vs 54.93% for FMTM. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VFLO charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FMTM.

Performance

VFLO vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFLO achieves a 20.81% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 26.52% return.

VFLO

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 3.37%
• 6M: 17.68%
• YTD: 20.81%
• 1Y: 34.02%
• 3Y*: 24.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FMTM

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -1.05%
• 6M: 19.24%
• YTD: 26.52%
• 1Y: 54.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VFLO vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	20.81%	14.50%
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	26.52%	28.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VFLO and FMTM is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2025	0.42

Return for Risk

VFLO vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFLO

VFLO Risk / Return Rank: 86
VFLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
VFLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
VFLO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
VFLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
VFLO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FMTM

FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 82
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFLO vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VFLO	FMTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	2.10	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	2.62	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.35	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.12	4.46	+0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.86	15.90	-0.04

VFLO vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFLO Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the FMTM Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFLO and FMTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VFLO vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFLO drawdown since its inception was -17.79%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFLO and FMTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFLO	FMTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.79%	-12.12%	-5.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.44%	-12.12%	+5.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.49%	-6.83%	+5.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-2.01%	-0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	3.39%	-1.28%

Volatility

VFLO vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO) is 4.94%, while MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM) has a volatility of 11.40%. This indicates that VFLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFLO	FMTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	11.40%	-6.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.06%	20.31%	-8.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.65%	25.66%	-10.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.01%	24.46%	-8.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.01%	24.46%	-8.45%

VFLO vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VFLO has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

VFLO vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

VFLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than FMTM's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FMTM MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF	0.23%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%
VFLO VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF	1.13%	1.60%	1.20%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VFLO and FMTM in my portfolio?

VFLO and FMTM have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VFLO or FMTM?

FMTM has higher volatility (11.40%) compared to VFLO (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFLO dropped -17.79% vs FMTM's -12.12%.

Which ETF is better, VFLO or FMTM?

On 1-year performance, FMTM leads with 54.93% vs 34.02% for VFLO. On fees, VFLO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, VFLO has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VFLO or FMTM?

Over the 1-year period, FMTM has performed better with a 54.93% return vs 34.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VFLO or FMTM?

VFLO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FMTM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VFLO or FMTM?

VFLO has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.23% for FMTM.

What is the main difference between VFLO and FMTM?

VFLO is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for VFLO and 0.45% for FMTM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VFLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.