VFH vs. BNKS.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L).
VFH and BNKS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VFH is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Financials 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. BNKS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Financials NR USD. It was launched on May 22, 2018. Both VFH and BNKS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
VFH vs. BNKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VFH vs. BNKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | -9.19% | 14.91% | 30.44% | 14.17% | -12.31% | 35.22% | -1.96% | 31.57% | -15.28% |
BNKS.L iShares S&P U.S. Banks | -2.97% | 20.45% | 28.55% | -3.74% | -18.79% | 39.71% | -12.04% | 36.28% | -24.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFH achieves a -9.19% return, which is significantly lower than BNKS.L's -2.97% return.
VFH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -3.54%
- YTD
- -9.19%
- 6M
- -6.32%
- 1Y
- 2.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
BNKS.L
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- -2.97%
- 6M
- 4.50%
- 1Y
- 23.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VFH vs. BNKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VFH has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BNKS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VFH vs. BNKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
VFH
BNKS.L
VFH vs. BNKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) and iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VFH | BNKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.14 | 0.92 | -0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.32 | 1.32 | -1.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.19 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 1.35 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.54 | 4.23 | -3.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VFH | BNKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | 0.92 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.19 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.17 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between VFH and BNKS.L is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
VFH vs. BNKS.L - Dividend Comparison
VFH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while BNKS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFH Vanguard Financials ETF | 1.61% | 1.55% | 1.75% | 2.08% | 2.31% | 1.87% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.30% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 2.00% |
BNKS.L iShares S&P U.S. Banks | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VFH vs. BNKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFH drawdown since its inception was -78.61%, which is greater than BNKS.L's maximum drawdown of -51.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFH and BNKS.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFH | BNKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.61% | -51.35% | -27.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -17.07% | +2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -50.15% | +24.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.95% | -11.58% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.62% | -17.98% | -0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.99% | 5.39% | -0.40% |
Volatility
VFH vs. BNKS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Financials ETF (VFH) is 4.85%, while iShares S&P U.S. Banks (BNKS.L) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that VFH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VFH | BNKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.85% | 7.60% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.75% | 15.44% | -3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.93% | 25.55% | -5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 27.75% | -8.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 31.71% | -9.16% |