VEVRX vs. XEMD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VEVRX (Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6) and XEMD (BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF) are both funds - VEVRX is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Victory, while XEMD is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JP Morgan EMBI Global Diversified Liquid 1-10 Y Maturity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. VEVRX is actively managed, while XEMD is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, VEVRX returned 11.71%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for XEMD. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VEVRX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XEMD.

Performance

VEVRX vs. XEMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6 (VEVRX) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEVRX achieves a 11.17% return, which is significantly higher than XEMD's 2.75% return.

VEVRX

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 1.63%
• YTD: 11.17%
• 6M: 10.75%
• 1Y: 16.34%
• 3Y*: 11.71%
• 5Y*: 7.16%
• 10Y*: 11.05%

XEMD

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 1.21%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 6M: 3.27%
• 1Y: 11.88%
• 3Y*: 11.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEVRX vs. XEMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
VEVRX Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6	11.17%	2.66%	10.18%	10.46%	9.28%
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF	2.75%	13.98%	8.77%	10.26%	1.82%

Correlation

The correlation between VEVRX and XEMD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2022	0.49

The correlation between VEVRX and XEMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VEVRX vs. XEMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEVRX

VEVRX Risk / Return Rank: 28
VEVRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
VEVRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
VEVRX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
VEVRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
VEVRX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

XEMD

XEMD Risk / Return Rank: 79
XEMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
XEMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
XEMD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
XEMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
XEMD Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEVRX vs. XEMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6 (VEVRX) and BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VEVRX	XEMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.40	2.57	-1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	3.88	-1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.51	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	3.39	-1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.22	15.27	-8.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VEVRX vs. XEMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEVRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the XEMD Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEVRX and XEMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VEVRX	XEMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.40	2.57	-1.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	1.39	-0.88

Drawdowns

VEVRX vs. XEMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEVRX drawdown since its inception was -41.00%, which is greater than XEMD's maximum drawdown of -10.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEVRX and XEMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	VEVRX	XEMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.00%	-10.01%	-30.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.49%	-3.52%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.25%	-4.31%	-15.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.37%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.07%	-1.26%	-3.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.39%	0.78%	+1.61%

Volatility

VEVRX vs. XEMD - Volatility Comparison

Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6 (VEVRX) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF (XEMD) at 1.43%. This indicates that VEVRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XEMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VEVRX	XEMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.11%	1.43%	+1.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.73%	3.70%	+5.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.34%	4.66%	+7.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.05%	6.88%	+10.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.21%	6.88%	+12.33%

VEVRX vs. XEMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEVRX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than XEMD's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

VEVRX vs. XEMD - Dividend Comparison

VEVRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than XEMD's 5.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VEVRX Victory Sycamore Established Value Fund Class R6	4.69%	4.81%	11.61%	6.20%	8.30%	8.42%	5.50%	6.12%	10.72%	3.36%	1.53%	11.57%
XEMD BondBloxx JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets 1-10 Year Bond ETF	5.82%	6.15%	6.30%	6.19%	3.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VEVRX and XEMD in my portfolio?

VEVRX and XEMD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VEVRX or XEMD?

VEVRX has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to XEMD (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEVRX dropped -41.00% vs XEMD's -10.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XEMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.