PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEVFX vs. VGPMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEVFX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Explorer Value Fund (VEVFX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEVFX achieves a 12.66% return, which is significantly lower than VGPMX's 19.56% return. Over the past 10 years, VEVFX has underperformed VGPMX with an annualized return of 9.83%, while VGPMX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.38% annualized return.


VEVFX

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.34%
YTD
12.66%
6M
15.71%
1Y
31.49%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
6.72%
10Y*
9.83%

VGPMX

1D
1.30%
1M
5.05%
YTD
19.56%
6M
25.36%
1Y
64.67%
3Y*
30.96%
5Y*
19.96%
10Y*
11.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEVFX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VEVFX
Vanguard Explorer Value Fund
12.66%7.40%13.81%15.29%-14.11%28.14%3.29%26.92%-13.03%12.43%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
19.56%65.96%5.78%10.06%7.34%19.50%17.21%20.67%-32.26%13.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VEVFX and VGPMX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2010

0.55

The correlation between VEVFX and VGPMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VEVFX vs. VGPMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEVFX
VGPMX

Financial Services

22.5%
5.7%

Industrials

16.6%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

16.0%
5.1%

Technology

9.9%
9.5%

Real Estate

7.9%
2.2%

Healthcare

7.5%
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
9.4%

Energy

4.3%
4.4%

Communication Services

4.1%
6.5%

Utilities

3.4%
4.7%

Basic Materials

3.3%
38.0%

Financial Services

VEVFX
22.5%
VGPMX
5.7%

Industrials

VEVFX
16.6%
VGPMX
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VEVFX
16.0%
VGPMX
5.1%

Technology

VEVFX
9.9%
VGPMX
9.5%

Real Estate

VEVFX
7.9%
VGPMX
2.2%

Healthcare

VEVFX
7.5%
VGPMX
11.9%

Consumer Defensive

VEVFX
4.7%
VGPMX
9.4%

Energy

VEVFX
4.3%
VGPMX
4.4%

Communication Services

VEVFX
4.1%
VGPMX
6.5%

Utilities

VEVFX
3.4%
VGPMX
4.7%

Basic Materials

VEVFX
3.3%
VGPMX
38.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEVFX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEVFX
VEVFX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
VEVFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEVFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEVFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
VEVFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEVFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VGPMX
VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEVFX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Explorer Value Fund (VEVFX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEVFXVGPMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

4.04

-2.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.61

4.84

-2.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.70

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.92

5.22

-2.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.02

21.80

-12.78

VEVFX vs. VGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEVFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the VGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEVFX and VGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEVFXVGPMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

4.04

-2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

1.16

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.55

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.26

+0.24

Drawdowns

VEVFX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEVFX drawdown since its inception was -47.53%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEVFX and VGPMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEVFXVGPMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.53%

-78.85%

+31.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.31%

-12.80%

+2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.32%

-14.63%

-12.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.32%

-22.71%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.53%

-54.59%

+7.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

0.00%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.62%

-34.56%

+27.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

3.06%

+0.27%

Volatility

VEVFX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Explorer Value Fund (VEVFX) is 4.63%, while Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that VEVFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEVFXVGPMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

5.91%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

13.81%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.62%

16.76%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.71%

17.37%

+3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.49%

21.04%

+1.45%

VEVFX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEVFX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEVFX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison

VEVFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, more than VGPMX's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VEVFX
Vanguard Explorer Value Fund
9.11%10.26%14.55%2.49%3.85%3.83%0.86%1.47%8.92%3.00%2.26%6.31%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
3.27%2.59%2.68%3.22%3.27%3.26%2.03%2.39%3.02%0.02%1.72%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEVFX and VGPMX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGPMX has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to VEVFX (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEVFX dropped -47.53% vs VGPMX's -78.85%.

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEVFX and VGPMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer