PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEUA.L vs. SSLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEUA.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VEUA.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VEUA.L is traded in GBP, while SSLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSLN.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEUA.L achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's 3.18% return.


VEUA.L

1D
0.78%
1M
3.51%
YTD
6.65%
6M
9.00%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*

SSLN.L

1D
0.48%
1M
1.18%
YTD
3.18%
6M
28.32%
1Y
115.93%
3Y*
42.31%
5Y*
22.99%
10Y*
16.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEUA.L vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VEUA.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating
6.65%26.07%4.49%13.45%-4.21%16.83%3.08%1.97%
SSLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC
3.18%130.26%23.21%-6.20%15.75%-11.64%40.73%3.42%

Correlation

The correlation between VEUA.L and SSLN.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2019

0.19

The correlation between VEUA.L and SSLN.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEUA.L vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEUA.L
VEUA.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VEUA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEUA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEUA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VEUA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEUA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SSLN.L
SSLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEUA.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VEUA.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEUA.LSSLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.98

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

6.53

+0.04

VEUA.L vs. SSLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEUA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the SSLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEUA.L and SSLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEUA.LSSLN.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.11

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.70

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.17

+0.44

Drawdowns

VEUA.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEUA.L drawdown since its inception was -28.45%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -69.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEUA.L and SSLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEUA.LSSLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.45%

-69.95%

+41.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-38.72%

+28.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-38.72%

+26.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.36%

-38.72%

+22.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-33.62%

+32.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-45.32%

+41.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

17.69%

-14.72%

Volatility

VEUA.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed Europe UCITS ETF (EUR) Accumulating (VEUA.L) is 4.10%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 16.31%. This indicates that VEUA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEUA.LSSLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

16.31%

-12.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.24%

51.81%

-41.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.15%

54.53%

-42.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.70%

33.31%

-19.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.83%

29.69%

-13.86%

VEUA.L vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEUA.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEUA.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VEUA.L nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VEUA.L and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEUA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEUA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSLN.L.

VEUA.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while SSLN.L is Silver. VEUA.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VEUA.L and 0.20% for SSLN.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEUA.L and SSLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer