PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEU vs. KEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEU vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEU achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.


VEU

1D
-0.98%
1M
5.07%
YTD
14.60%
6M
17.34%
1Y
32.37%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
8.67%
10Y*
9.94%

KEMX

1D
-1.31%
1M
13.02%
YTD
42.26%
6M
47.92%
1Y
79.97%
3Y*
29.66%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEU vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
14.60%32.35%5.56%15.84%-15.58%8.27%11.10%7.42%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
42.26%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%12.84%7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between VEU and KEMX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019

0.86

The correlation between VEU and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

VEU vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VEU
KEMX

Financial Services

23.3%
20.7%

Technology

18.5%
41.2%

Industrials

15.7%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

8.2%
5.4%

Basic Materials

7.1%
8.2%

Healthcare

7.1%
1.7%

Energy

5.2%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
3.0%

Communication Services

4.6%
3.2%

Utilities

3.2%
2.0%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.2%

Financial Services

VEU
23.3%
KEMX
20.7%

Technology

VEU
18.5%
KEMX
41.2%

Industrials

VEU
15.7%
KEMX
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VEU
8.2%
KEMX
5.4%

Basic Materials

VEU
7.1%
KEMX
8.2%

Healthcare

VEU
7.1%
KEMX
1.7%

Energy

VEU
5.2%
KEMX
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

VEU
5.1%
KEMX
3.0%

Communication Services

VEU
4.6%
KEMX
3.2%

Utilities

VEU
3.2%
KEMX
2.0%

Real Estate

VEU
2.0%
KEMX
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEU vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEU
VEU Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEU Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEU vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEUKEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.62

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

5.24

-2.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.06

20.86

-9.80

VEU vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEU Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEU and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEUKEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

3.59

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.75

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.68

-0.43

Drawdowns

VEU vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEU drawdown since its inception was -61.52%, which is greater than KEMX's maximum drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEU and KEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEUKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.52%

-38.80%

-22.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-15.36%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.69%

-19.62%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

-30.85%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-1.31%

+0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-8.86%

-4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.85%

-0.92%

Volatility

VEU vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF (VEU) is 5.59%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that VEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEUKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

9.86%

-4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.04%

19.90%

-6.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.29%

22.40%

-7.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.07%

18.21%

-2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

20.94%

-3.73%

VEU vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEU has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VEU vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

VEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than KEMX's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.31%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEU
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US ETF
2.61%3.09%3.24%3.32%3.12%3.08%2.00%3.10%3.27%2.66%2.96%2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEU and KEMX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to VEU (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEU dropped -61.52% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 8.67% for VEU. On fees, VEU is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VEU has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 8.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEU is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for KEMX.

VEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 2.31% for KEMX.

VEU tracks FTSE All-World ex US Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for VEU and 0.25% for KEMX.

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEU and KEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer