PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VERS vs. TINY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VERS vs. TINY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VERS achieves a 20.88% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 66.66% return.


VERS

1D
-4.41%
1M
-5.52%
YTD
20.88%
6M
19.83%
1Y
47.06%
3Y*
26.24%
5Y*
10Y*

TINY

1D
-6.24%
1M
10.57%
YTD
66.66%
6M
66.53%
1Y
113.36%
3Y*
32.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VERS vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VERS
ProShares Metaverse ETF
20.88%26.16%16.92%51.13%-33.05%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
66.66%19.98%6.63%47.97%-20.92%

Correlation

The correlation between VERS and TINY is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022

0.79

The correlation between VERS and TINY shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VERS vs. TINY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VERS
TINY

Technology

76.6%
70.5%

Communication Services

16.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
4.6%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

9.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

10.4%

Industrials

-

4.8%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

VERS
76.6%
TINY
70.5%

Communication Services

VERS
16.2%
TINY

-

Consumer Cyclical

VERS
6.0%
TINY
4.6%

Real Estate

VERS
1.3%
TINY

-

Basic Materials

VERS

-

TINY
9.8%

Consumer Defensive

VERS

-

TINY

-

Energy

VERS

-

TINY

-

Financial Services

VERS

-

TINY

-

Healthcare

VERS

-

TINY
10.4%

Industrials

VERS

-

TINY
4.8%

Utilities

VERS

-

TINY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VERS vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VERS
VERS Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VERS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VERS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
VERS Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
VERS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VERS Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

TINY
TINY Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VERS vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VERSTINYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.49

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

6.81

-4.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.74

23.81

-18.07

VERS vs. TINY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VERS Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the TINY Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VERS and TINY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VERS vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VERS drawdown since its inception was -42.13%, roughly equal to the maximum TINY drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VERS and TINY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VERSTINYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.13%

-43.79%

+1.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.02%

-16.75%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.34%

-42.13%

+12.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.35%

-6.24%

-6.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.97%

-15.99%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.22%

4.78%

+3.44%

Volatility

VERS vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Metaverse ETF (VERS) has a higher volatility of 14.64% compared to ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) at 13.31%. This indicates that VERS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TINY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VERSTINYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.64%

13.31%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.73%

28.58%

-4.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.08%

34.52%

-5.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.69%

32.69%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.69%

32.69%

-1.00%

VERS vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VERS and TINY have an expense ratio of 0.58%.


Dividends

VERS vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison

VERS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than TINY's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
0.18%0.29%0.01%0.35%0.42%0.07%
VERS
ProShares Metaverse ETF
0.27%0.52%0.58%0.63%0.44%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VERS and TINY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VERS has higher volatility (14.64%) compared to TINY (13.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VERS dropped -42.13% vs TINY's -43.79%.

On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 32.44% vs 26.24% for VERS. Both ETFs have the same 0.58% expense ratio. On volatility, TINY has been the lower-risk option at 13.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 32.44% return vs 26.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VERS and TINY have the same expense ratio: 0.58% per year.

VERS has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.18% for TINY.

VERS tracks Solactive Metaverse Theme Index - Benchmark TR Net, while TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index.

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VERS and TINY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer