PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMY vs. VCIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMY vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMY achieves a 6.07% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's -0.40% return.


VEMY

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.46%
6M
3.41%
YTD
6.07%
1Y
13.28%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.11%

VCIT

1D
0.24%
1M
-1.08%
6M
-0.52%
YTD
-0.40%
1Y
2.44%
3Y*
5.88%
5Y*
0.65%
10Y*
2.68%
ALL TIME*
4.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$669.46M$649.77M$718.40M
$924.57K$860.95K$887.68K

VEMY vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
6.07%15.27%13.48%14.45%-1.43%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
-0.40%9.34%3.20%8.98%-1.35%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMY and VCIT is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022

0.59

The correlation between VEMY and VCIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMY vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VEMY
VEMY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VEMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VEMY vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VEMYVCITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.10

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

0.83

+2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.31

2.30

+13.01

VEMY vs. VCIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMY Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the VCIT Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMY and VCIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VEMY vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMY drawdown since its inception was -8.77%, smaller than the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMY and VCIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMYVCITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-20.56%

+11.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

-2.96%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.57%

-5.29%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-1.93%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.27%

-3.14%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

1.06%

-0.19%

Volatility

VEMY vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) has a higher volatility of 1.19% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) at 1.13%. This indicates that VEMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMYVCITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

1.13%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.54%

3.30%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.04%

4.03%

+2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.52%

6.63%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.52%

6.29%

+1.23%

VEMY vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEMY vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison

VEMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, more than VCIT's 4.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.89%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
8.09%8.89%10.28%9.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEMY and VCIT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEMY has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to VCIT (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEMY dropped -8.77% vs VCIT's -20.56%.

On 3-year performance, VEMY leads with 14.01% vs 5.88% for VCIT. On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VEMY has performed better with a 14.01% return vs 5.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for VEMY.

VEMY has the higher dividend yield at 8.09%, compared with 4.89% for VCIT.

VEMY is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while VCIT is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for VEMY and 0.03% for VCIT.

VEMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMY and VCIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer