PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VEMY vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VEMY vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VEMY achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.


VEMY

1D
0.03%
1M
1.22%
YTD
5.93%
6M
6.67%
1Y
18.43%
3Y*
15.52%
5Y*
10Y*

UGA

1D
-2.73%
1M
-12.25%
YTD
70.69%
6M
59.72%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VEMY vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
5.93%15.27%13.48%14.45%-1.08%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
70.69%-2.00%3.77%1.27%14.41%

Correlation

The correlation between VEMY and UGA is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2022

-0.04

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between VEMY and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.04 to -0.30, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VEMY vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VEMY
VEMY Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
VEMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEMY Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VEMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEMY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VEMY vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VEMYUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.37

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.62

5.37

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.97

12.86

+9.11

VEMY vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VEMY Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VEMY and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VEMYUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

2.27

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.83

0.12

+1.71

Drawdowns

VEMY vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VEMY drawdown since its inception was -8.77%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VEMY and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VEMYUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.77%

-86.59%

+77.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.00%

-14.88%

+10.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.57%

-26.68%

+20.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-14.75%

+14.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.30%

-36.76%

+35.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

6.20%

-5.36%

Volatility

VEMY vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (VEMY) is 1.54%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.64%. This indicates that VEMY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VEMYUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.54%

11.64%

-10.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

30.48%

-25.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.05%

35.27%

-29.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.63%

34.40%

-26.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.63%

37.27%

-29.64%

VEMY vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VEMY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

VEMY vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

VEMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.37%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEMY
Virtus Stone Harbor Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
8.37%8.89%10.28%9.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


VEMY and UGA have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.64%) compared to VEMY (1.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VEMY dropped -8.77% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 3-year performance, UGA leads with 20.80% vs 15.52% for VEMY. On fees, VEMY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, VEMY has been the lower-risk option at 1.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, UGA has performed better with a 20.80% return vs 15.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEMY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

VEMY has the higher dividend yield at 8.37%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

VEMY is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Virtus and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for VEMY and 0.75% for UGA.

VEMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VEMY and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer